you mean "not yet" ur parroting Trump's tweet today, which contradicts what he had said on TV, in late 2017, when Reporters asked if he believes that the Russians had meddled w our election. Trump's response was " I've spoken w him (Putin) twice about it. He feels that the Russians didn't meddled". that was good enough for the dotard have you been living in a cave ? you do know about Fredo Trump's emails w the foreigners from Russians (in the Putin orbit) and their subsequent meeting in Trump Tower in ~ July 2016, no ? the email trails show there was an offer (by the foreigners from Russia) of dirt on Trump's campaign's opponent and an acceptance by Fredo, as evidenced by his email content "love it, specially in late Summer" that, coupled w the subsequent meeting w the foreigners from Russia in Trump Tower, is convincing evidence of collusion between Fredo (as well as Kushner and Manafort) an the foreigners from Russia. it is so convincing that, perhaps Mueller hasn't even bother to interview Fredo yet just my guess Muller is squeezing Flynn, Papadoukas to spill the bean on his superiors he is also squeezing Rick Gates, who is about to flip on Manaport Mueller will interview the not-so-bright Fredo and too-smart-for-his-own-good Kushner, catching them lying he will squeeze them to get them flip on the dotard, that he knew about the meeting w the Ruskies in Trump Tower
Maybe this thread would have gone better if OP had simply used NAHT and avoided quotation marks. "I did naht collude with her -- I did naaahhht! ... oh hai Bob."
You don't understand. Unless you follow the left orthodoxy of pure hatred of all things Trump, YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM. Hell, you might as well just be Donald Trump. To them, the world is black and white. No shades of gray whatsoever.
NOT YET - but Mueller is boxing him in... Trump is trying to play checkers, and Mueller is playing chess. DD
This poster you are defending is playing a shtick. He's defended actions from Trump that you, an actual conservative leaning poster, won't even defend. How naive are you?
Exactly, Mueller: No one related to Trump administration is indicated in THIS time. Trump: No one will be indicated LOL.
Or if he didn't start in a forum with a bunch of people who can't accept Trump won whose last hopes of impeachment have been dashed
Disagree with you strongly, again. I for one see plenty of shades of gray in almost every issue. I'm not sure the far right is very good at shades of gray actually but let's leave that aside. Let's take your main criticism, that some of us hate "all things Trump." I can sit with that, and say, yeah, he's right. As a President of my nation, I do kind of hate his mendacity, his insecurity, his speech, his tweets, his actions, his inactions, his complete inability to handle criticism like an adult human, his narcissism, nearly all of his appointments, the people he chose to surround himself with, his using my tax $ for his own golf resorts, his aversion to truth, his neglect of science, his appointing his own family members to key positions, his erratic behavior, his terrible roll-modeling of an American and a man, his getting in the way and confusing possible policy advances and compromises, etc, et multi alia. But I'm open to liking something about his presidency. So let me honestly ask you: what do you LIKE about his presidency so far? Do you think it's a good balance with all that is horrible about his presidency?
I wish that was his job. See I'll be up front and honest. I'm willing to remove a man who has such little self-awareness that he states "I'm like a smart person" in a non-sarcastic manner from the position of managing the world's largest bureaucracy and commander of the world's most powerful military by any means necessary that doesn't involve violence. Unfortunately Robert Mueller has too much integrity for that.
Mueller's job is investigate and prosecute all thing related to the Russian meddling, except he will likely not indict the President.* Mueller will present his findings to the House, who will decide whether or not to impeach. Now you wrote ... which I seriously have no idea WTF by that you mean. Do you mean the Republican House will never impeach Trump for anything ever? Do you mean that Republicans will maintain control of the House in the 2018 elections, thus guaranteeing Trump will not get impeach in his first term? * I do not think that this is decided law and would require the USSC to decide.
For those keeping score ... Mueller did not indict Trump on either Saturday or Sunday. Trump was twice vindicated!
The bar has been set so low that a week without any indictments of members within the Trump adminstration can be spinned into positive news. This **** is hilarious.
Heehee... ...I mean yeah, well, when you put it like that...! ...wasn't notorious career criminal and murderer Al Capone finally put in jail for tax evasion...? What's that Calvin Murphy used to say all the time with Bill Worrell...? "...if the left one don't get ya, then the right one will..."...?
At what point if you're Comrade Putin do you start losing your patience with this guy? He's the only 'right winger' in the world you associate with and he's now talking out both sides of his mouth.
Half of you guys claiming to be non-partisan are just libertarians who would be just as partisan as everyone else if the libertarian party was actually a serious threat to win a presidential election.
