1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Wow - 4th pick potentially to Cleveland

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by 1234567, Dec 24, 2017.

  1. 1234567

    1234567 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    296
    Likes Received:
    166
    Was it worth It?

    I still say yes for Watson but that 2nd to make Cleveland take that bum, that sucks.

    So with the 4th pick in the 3rd round, Texans pick....
     
  2. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    12,238
    Likes Received:
    7,489
    The 1st round pick doesn't hurt.........it is the 2nd round pick to get rid of Brock that is the issue.
     
    juanm34 likes this.
  3. Dankstronaut

    Dankstronaut Way, way out here.
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    8,616
    Likes Received:
    11,875
    If we didn’t trade for Watson....

    We’d be picking 2 nd at worst. Thanks Ricky.
     
  4. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    63,470
    Likes Received:
    26,090
    So long as Watson bounces back and plays like a top 10 QB, I don't give a damn what pick the Browns get for deciding to not have a franchise QB.
     
  5. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    12,238
    Likes Received:
    7,489
    um........so, you would rather have one of the QBs coming out than Watson? I wouldn't.
     
  6. coachbadlee

    coachbadlee Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    28,050
    Likes Received:
    8,556
    WTF?? You're kidding, right?
     
  7. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,131
    Trading away a second round pick just to get rid of Osweiler is one of the dumbest trades in history.
     
    juanm34, eric.81 and arkoe like this.
  8. today

    today Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    2,123
    Likes Received:
    1,051
    I think signing him in the first place was worse.
     
    DonnyMost, Uprising, Clutch and 4 others like this.
  9. JayGoogle

    JayGoogle Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    50,214
    Likes Received:
    40,933
    Browns going to F it up anyway, we know they will. They are going to have two top 5 picks and screw this up somehow.
     
    Shaunjon likes this.
  10. rezdawg

    rezdawg Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,148
    The whole point of trading Osweiler was bc we were trying to get cap space for Romo. Hindsight is 20/20...but at that time, it made sense to get rid of a guy that had created a lot of distraction and had no future with the team. If Jerry Jones had released Romo in a timely manner, the Texans had positioned themselves to be financially able to sign him.

    Yes, knowing that we could have had Watson and he'd be an amazing QB after watching him play in the NFL is one thing, but nobody knew anything back then....we just knew we needed a QB and Osweiler being on the roster prevented us from getting a guy like Romo.
     
    Mr. Brightside likes this.
  11. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,131
    Yeah they were both bad.

    Two of the things smart offices don't do is trade away a ton of picks and overpay for free agents.

    The current Texans are an experiment in the opposite.
     
    today likes this.
  12. tehG l i d e

    tehG l i d e Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    23,258
    Likes Received:
    14,150
    I'm glad we have Watson now but Garappolo was still there for the taking. I knew he was going to be good.
     
    red5rocket likes this.
  13. Nimo

    Nimo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Messages:
    13,392
    Likes Received:
    7,056
    Just look at the Watson trade as a 1st and 2nd. Think about how much was traded for Goff and Wentz. Very comparable. Neither of those teams are complaining or having regrets.
     
    juanm34 and DreamShook like this.
  14. bobrek

    bobrek Politics belong in the D & D

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 1999
    Messages:
    36,288
    Likes Received:
    26,639
    If Watson wasn't on the team, the whole year would have changed. Chances are neither Watt nor Mercilus would have been hurt. Team would probably have floundered to around 8-8 on the strength of a better defense and still been looking for a QB.
     
  15. Nimo

    Nimo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Messages:
    13,392
    Likes Received:
    7,056
    Someone has been watching butterfly effect I see.
     
    Dankstronaut likes this.
  16. bobrek

    bobrek Politics belong in the D & D

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 1999
    Messages:
    36,288
    Likes Received:
    26,639
    You simply cannot make the assumption that everything would have remained exactly the same had something never happened. Not the butterfly effect...it's common sense.
     
  17. TEXNIFICENT

    TEXNIFICENT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    7,755
    Likes Received:
    6,440
    For a QB playing like Watson? Well worth it. And Cleveland still doesn't have a QB.
     
  18. Nimo

    Nimo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Messages:
    13,392
    Likes Received:
    7,056
    You can't make any assumptions so why make assumptions that Watt and Whitney don' get injured ?
     
    joshuaao likes this.
  19. bobrek

    bobrek Politics belong in the D & D

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 1999
    Messages:
    36,288
    Likes Received:
    26,639
    You can make all kinds of assumptions. So, in theory, I guess you can assume the season progresses the exact same way, but it's highly doubtful.
     
  20. zeeshan2

    zeeshan2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2013
    Messages:
    48,583
    Likes Received:
    52,044
    who would you rather have in this year’s draft instead of Watson anyway?

    They will probably take kirkpatrick, a qb, or saquan
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now