1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Trump] An invitation for Evangelicals to Debate the Merits of Supporting Trump

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Rox>Mavs, Dec 22, 2019.

  1. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,717
    Likes Received:
    18,918
    Did you know a few hundred years ago there was no borders and people moved freely? Yet there wasn't this problem you had today? You know why the problem exists today?
     
  2. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,560
    Likes Received:
    1,209

    Yeah I completely agree with pretty much everything you’ve said and the assessment of the perceived cultural wars.....that’s why I’m thinking this has to do with education, teaching and discipline within the church.

    I have two advanced theological degrees and enjoy a robust debate with anyone on the bible. And I still find it hard to really pin trump supporters on their theology. When I start honing it in, they typically disengage which tells me they’re no longer comfortable having their worldview challenged biblically. Which in turn tells me they’re more devoted to their worldview than they are the Bible.
     
    No Worries likes this.
  3. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,560
    Likes Received:
    1,209
    this is deeply flawed theologically. You might be speaking from a policy perspective and what’s good for America, but you are not speaking from what is reflective of what Scripture says. There is no basis in the Bible for what you’re suggesting.
     
  4. Space Ghost

    Space Ghost Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    15,067
    Likes Received:
    6,244
    What a mess of comparisons.

    Do you believe a homosexual baker should be forced to decorate a cake with an anti-homosexual theme or with racial slurs? The answer is NO! We are not a pure socialist state where the government has dictated which job we are to perform.

    If someone takes a job that requires them to uphold a legal standing, then yes, they should absolutely should. If they disagree with said statute, then they should either ask a heathen to do the job or resign. Nothing to debate here.

    Again, very simple logic. If you disagree with one of your job requirements, you either ask it to be changed or you resign.

    If I am a sole proprietor, I set my responsibilities and conditions of my job and business, provided they are within the confines of the law. Virtue signaling Sweet Lou 42 does not get to define my responsibilities and conditions. If my business model is offensive to the general public, there will be a point where I will not be able to sustain my business model. Perhaps North Korea is a better fit for someone like you.
     
  5. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,560
    Likes Received:
    1,209
    I have some things to say about this. Among other things I’m a business owner too. One food retail and one service (counseling practice). I have a lot of thoughts on doing business as a Christian. It’s another area where, like engaging in politics, a Christian really needs to understand their theology in order to walk the line well. Unfortunately what happens is a lot of democracy or capitalism infects Christian thinking and they way politics and business are handled.

    But alas I must disengage this interesting discussion. I have to go to this thing called church now.
     
    SamFisher likes this.
  6. dachuda86

    dachuda86 Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    16,308
    Likes Received:
    3,580
    Because not protecting your territories is foolish and a classic reason why civilizations collapse. Also the modern world is much different from older times.
     
  7. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    24,002
    Likes Received:
    19,912
    Agreed. They disengage by changing the topic by putting Liberals on trial. They’ll never just have a deep theological discussion. I don’t know if it’s education in theology as much as it is selective cherry picking to the parts of the Bible that fit their narrative that their political religious media guides them to. It’s not an full objective view of the Bible’s teachings anymore which is where I believe is the fundamental area that faith leaders have really destroyed the credibility of Christianity in America.

    Ex: The cherry picked section of the Bible that is constantly discussed is Sodom and Gomorra. They truly believe and faith leaders like Pat Robertson say it all the time, that the reason why states like California have so many natural disasters is because God is punishing them for their liberalization of their state. They truly believe if a state like Texas is allowed to “liberalize” that God will punish the state with floods, fire, etc.

    So if you were someone that honestly believed your state will face earthquakes, and fires if you vote for Beto over Ted Cruz because Beto will liberalize the laws in Texas, what would you do?

    So yes in a way it is about their education in the Bible, but more of an ignorance driven by their conservative media sources who have planted fear in their hearts and poisoned their minds.
     
  8. dachuda86

    dachuda86 Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    16,308
    Likes Received:
    3,580
    I think it is not flawed, but tell me why you think that. The Bible says put God as a Top priority. This is implied when it instructs women to put God over their husbands essentially. This is obviously showing a hierarchy of God over family. Now, can you think of something that would be put in between those on a hierarchy? This is why it is commonly understood by people that God is first, family second. Is this a lock solid explanation? No, I give you the cliff notes, but one can surmise this easily. It is also largely what I have heard from Christians and is accepted. But moving on... when you give literally everything you have and don't help your family and make sure they have a good future, you hurt them. Unrestricted immigration for example, if you can't afford to do it, is a bad idea. It would hurt your child's future because you wrecked your homeland. It's the same as giving all your wages to the homeless guy you see on the street and then you can't afford to give medicine and food to your kids. You have to take care of them and that includes planning for their future and making sure they have a decent country to live in. Help the poor, as you should, but only as much as you can. This means don't open the flood gates and ruin your country. This means give that homeless man 5 bucks or buy him some dinner, and move on. Christians are not required to give all if it hurts their family.

    Obviously I am not advocating to ignore helping the poor and the refugees of the world. That's not what I'm getting at. In fact I think we should help them. I just think giving must be done within one's means, as long as one can still provide for one's family which is a Top priority. And even if you find this flawed, please explain to me how you can justify putting strangers before one's own family?
     
    #168 dachuda86, Dec 29, 2019
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2019
  9. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,560
    Likes Received:
    1,209
    yes I’d love to break this down further, but I’ll get back to this later today. Need to get the kids ready and out the door for church.
     
    dachuda86 likes this.
  10. dachuda86

    dachuda86 Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    16,308
    Likes Received:
    3,580
    Well, even though we disagree, I wish you well. Have a great day.
     
    Rox>Mavs likes this.
  11. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    24,002
    Likes Received:
    19,912
    See this is where the talking points take the conversation off rails and distract from the topic at hand.

    Nobody believes border or territory protection is not vitally important. Especially when you have natural resources in a world with deteriorating natural resources (aka immigration north via climate change). It’s vitally important to have immigration processing and protection from hostile infiltration.

    The issue is Trump and the border wall is about the stupidity of throwing up a 2000 mile long cement wall in the middle of the Desert, and the ignorance with his base about the eminent domain issue in Texas and Arizona with ceasing private property. There are still dozens of court battles FROM THE BUSH era when Bush tried to seize land for border fencing a decade ago.

    Fact is the Trump border wall is a stupidity and ignorance fed dog whistle. It’s not a real solution although territory protection is. Some border fencing IS necessary in certain areas. It’s not that hard of a conversation to have.

    However this is not the topic that the OP had wanted to discuss so back on topic.
     
  12. dachuda86

    dachuda86 Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    16,308
    Likes Received:
    3,580
    I am not debating the border wall. I am debating the idea of just letting anyone in and having open borders. SO I don't think we disagree on too much in regard to the thread. I was just saying helping everyone is impossible without collapsing your society. If we open borders completely we will be doomed.


    They argument I hear from people is give the shirt of your back if you are a Christian and it ignores the reality at hand. You can't help everyone before you doom yourself. It's just not possible.

    I am not arguing against helping people, just that there is a limit to generosity.
     
  13. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,717
    Likes Received:
    18,918
    Doesn't sound like you know history
     
  14. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    24,002
    Likes Received:
    19,912
    I think the difference that is not being debated because of politics is the fact that there’s a big difference in letting in refugees or at least processing them and helping place them and an infiltrating army. FoxNews has diluted the ability to dicier the difference in the two. Democrats need to be better too at controlling that debate to bring people out of their ignorant talking points from Fox.
     
  15. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,560
    Likes Received:
    1,209

    The order of priority isn’t the problem. I agree, there is reason to believe that the bible supports a relationship with God as first priority, then marriage, then kids, then church, then culture & community.

    That’s not where the flaw is though. I think you make a jump between prioritizing and protecting. And a jump between how to love each of those groups well and protectionism. And then another jump from helping immigrants and refugees to a threat that requires protectionism.

    At the end of all those logic jumps is the need for protectionism. So you’ve tied a theological principle of loving God, family and neighbors in that order to justifying a protectionist mindset. Which protectionism has never been a Christian tenant of faith. That’s no where in Scripture. In fact quite the opposite. Christians are called to risk themselves and sacrifice for the sake of loving others.

    But to your point of not being able to help everyone. There is merit in the Bible for Christians not enabling destructive behavior. Being a “good Christian” doesn’t mean rolling over to help everyone that asks or needs help. It requires discernment to know how to help and love others in ways that does not end up destroying them. It’s the same principle for parenting. To love well means knowing when to say “no” for the sake of your children’s own growth and maturation. But the common denominator is love. What is best for the person you’re called to help and love. The posture comes from love and what’s best for others, not fear or protectionism.

    In practical terms, would I allow a refugee or someone homeless to sleep on the floor of my kids room? No of course not, but that wouldn’t prohibit me from being able and willing to help in other ways. That might take resources and time away from my family to do so, but I have to discern how much I can do. And indeed my faith dictates that to some degree I ought to. But I have to discern that out of love and sacrifice. Not fear and the need to protect against. And not out of a scarcity mindset where we only have a limited resource and have to protect it to provide for “our own”.

    protectionism/fear and a scarcity mindset are more nationalistic based. There’s no Christian basis for either of those.
     
    Rileydog, Invisible Fan and dachuda86 like this.
  16. dachuda86

    dachuda86 Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    16,308
    Likes Received:
    3,580
    I tie it to the idea of not allowing unrelenting immigration... people who want to have unrestricted imigration for refugees and around here in cutchfans many here basically want open borders beyond refugees. I am saying protect the existing border and enforce the laws and I am rejecting the idea that christians should allow open borders just because there are some biblical calls to help the poor. I am arguing that there is a limit. That is all. I actually don't see a large point of disagreement with your take.
     
  17. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,560
    Likes Received:
    1,209
    i think the disagreement is that your point isn’t a “Christian” one. You can certainly argue for limits and border control, but you can’t tie that to any biblical concept in Christianity. The two are unrelated. It doesn’t mean your point of limits is invalid on its own. It’s just not based on anything biblical.
     
    B-Bob and Os Trigonum like this.
  18. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,560
    Likes Received:
    1,209
    1) your example isn’t comparable one. Making a wedding cake for a gay couple isn’t the same as placing a hateful message on that cake. It may be offensive to the Christian baker, but my contention is that it shouldn’t be. I’ll explain why in my break down below.

    2) as a sole proprietor, you’re right you can set the terms of your business. From a free market standpoint you could argue that you have the right to refuse service and allow the market to dictate whether you’ll be able to stay in business. But from a Christian standpoint, there is no basis for refusing service to those whose lifestyles you don’t agree with. Let me explain why:

    Let me break this down from three points of view that I look at the issue as a Christian.

    Role #1 (Business Owner): my primary job function in this role is to serve food (or desert) in my context. If someone asked for a catered event at a same sex marriage or for me to vend at a gay pride parade (both of which have happened), as a Christian I have to be comfortable enough in my theology and faith to intersect with a culture and community that doesn’t think or believe the same way I do. Bringing my own Christian values into how I conduct my business really can only be applied to how I conduct myself, not how I think others ought to conduct themselves. Especially considering that it should not be alarming or offensive to me when an unbeliever acts or behaves in ways that aren’t “Christian”. That’s part of my role by being willing to intersect and engage an unbelieving community. It’s my choice to engage through business so I have to be okay with stretching my comfort level. Just as an aside, I actually hired a GM that’s gay and in the last year has transitioned genders. Eventually sold my business to him. He’s a friend of mine to this day and has helped me to understand and have more compassion and understanding of the LGBTQ community.

    Role #2 (counselor): in this role I continue to engage a community that does not necessarily share my beliefs. While a portion of my case load are Christians. Many, if not most, aren’t. So I have done couples/marriage counseling for same sex couples. I don’t have a problem with it because my job as a licensed professional requires me to engage in areas of culture that don’t see things the way I do. Now I can choose to only be a “Christian counselor” and choose not to see such couples, as I’m sure they’d probably not want to see me if that were the case. But as a Christian I feel like I’d be losing out on an opportunity to stretch my own thinking and compassion.

    Role #3 (pastor): in this capacity I work for a religious institution and because of separation of church and state, I can and have opted to not perform same sex marriages. Because of my religious views and because the request for a marriage ceremony falls under my authority and role within the Church, I can’t perform this function without violating the role itself. But in this context, it’s when the culture seeks to enter into and engage the Church. Whereas roles 1 and 2 are me engaging the culture. The more I reach out in my roles to engage, the more I have to be willing to stretch. The more the culture moves into Church, the more it must stretch. It’s a constant dance of transformation through compassionate dialogue.

    Christians are called to transform culture through engagement and that means engaging in places where people do things that aren’t “Christian” which shouldn’t be surprising because, well because they’re not Christian.

    The principle I was taught in my course of missions is, the more confident and secure you are in your core doctrine and theology, the more you can venture out into culture and even blend in by participating in some of the customs that might feel “unchristian”. But conversely, the weaker you are in your theology, the more you have to fear and protect against the culture that doesn’t think or act like you.

    - To a Jew I became a Jew, the gentile I became a gentile.

    So bottom line, if serving a gay couple a wedding cake is offensive to your Christian sensibilities, you shouldn’t be doing business in the market place where you’re required to service people that think and act different from you.

    If you’re a Christian that owns a business you have to be able and ready to walk the line between Church and culture. If you can’t walk the line, then choose. Run it purely as a business. Or don’t go into business. Capitalism and Christianity don’t mix well if you don’t know how to walk the line.
     
  19. dachuda86

    dachuda86 Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    16,308
    Likes Received:
    3,580
    Not directly, but with the right amout of thought put into it, you can use it as a justification if you think you are defending your family's future and see little other option. Depending on your take on the effects of open borders and basically giving all you humanly can to those less fortunate. In this example immigrants who are poor. However, my main point is that the Bible doesn't force Christians to give everything up at the expense of their own well being. Especially one's own family. But I do see where you are coming from.
     
  20. Rox>Mavs

    Rox>Mavs Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,560
    Likes Received:
    1,209
    This right here is the problem though. The Bible can be used by anyone willing to disregard its proper theology to justify personal agendas that were never Christian. And those with poor theology will hear it and assume it to be a Christian principle when it’s not.

    the crusades and slavery were justified through such means. My point isn’t that your position on border control is wrong. My whole point in this thread is that Christianity is used as a tool to justify agendas under the guise of Christianity. Which for me as a Christian is offensive because it pollutes the message of the gospel.

    But to your specific point about the Bible not supporting Christians give up everything, while I do think through wise discernment you can get o being able to set boundaries and say no when it’s the most loving thing you can do for another, I actually think the Bible is more directly blatant about sacrificing everything.

    that is PRECISELY what God did through Christ did for humanity. He gave up everything to save us. But here are some more specific verses that articulate this Christian principle. These are just a few. It’d be much more difficult to find a verse in the Bible that justifies looking out for yourself before others. It’d certainly be a stretch to argue that that’s what the Bible argues for.

    1 John 3:16 ESV
    By this we know love, that he laid down his life for us, and we ought to lay down our lives for the brothers.


    Mark 10:45 ESV
    For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”

    Philippians 2:17 ESV
    Even if I am to be poured out as a drink offering upon the sacrificial offering of your faith, I am glad and rejoice with you all.

    Ephesians 5:1-2 ESV
    Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children. And walk in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God.

    Luke 9:23 ESV
    And he said to all, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me.

    Philippians 2:3-4 ESV
    Do nothing from rivalry or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves. Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others.
     
    T_Man, BaselineFade, RayRay10 and 2 others like this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now