1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

  2. ROCKETS GAMEDAY
    Dave and Bryson (@RedNationBlogga) hop on for the late-night recap after the Rockets take on Nikola Jokic and the Nuggets in Denver. Come join us!

    LIVE! ClutchFans on YouTube

Supreme Court: "It's just Jersey"

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by rimrocker, Oct 8, 2002.

  1. mav3434

    mav3434 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2001
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    0
    Plenty of people across the political spectrum disagree. What got to most, including me, was the trumped up finding of irreperable harm for the injunction that made the eventual decision a foregone conclusion.
     
  2. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    66,724
    Likes Received:
    34,369
    . . .a statement made by the doer of the 1st wrong.

    Rocket River
    "Two wrongs don't make it right .. . but it damn sure makes it even" - Onyx
     
  3. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,446
    I know.
     
  4. Refman

    Refman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Messages:
    13,674
    Likes Received:
    312
    You need to read the opinion. The notion of irreparable harm was a small part of the opinion. It dealt more with the lack of standards being Constitutionally impermissible. They went to great lenghts to follow the logic from the very inception of the electoral process to the present day. I was VERY surprised when I read the full opinion. It was actually a very well written opinion.
     

Share This Page