1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

STACKED at every position..

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by dream2franchise, Jul 7, 2002.

  1. dream2franchise

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    2,292
    Likes Received:
    900
    Damn, we are deep, maybe too deep. Somebodys gotsta go.
     
  2. lovethisgametoo

    Joined:
    May 25, 2002
    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    0
    Tell me how 'deep' our center and SG are... I cannot figure out myself.
     
  3. mfclark

    mfclark Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    Messages:
    2,440
    Likes Received:
    0
    You can never have enough depth. Remember that most of the team is very young - Cuttino is one of the older players at 26-27.

    The Rockets' goal, as I recall, is to be 2 deep everywhere. They aren't there yet - especially at shooting guard. Trades may be forthcoming, considering the glut of SFs and PFs on the roster, but aren't necessarily neccessary.

    So, in essence, nobody's "gotsta go." Continuity counts for a lot.
     
  4. travfrancis

    travfrancis Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2001
    Messages:
    831
    Likes Received:
    115
    at center we are very strong with ming/cato

    and at sg we have a top 8 player and a decent backup in oscar torres
     
  5. dream2franchise

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    2,292
    Likes Received:
    900
    my point is the same as travfrancis, if not for the contract, many teams would want Cato.
    Mobley is easily a top 10 SG who loves his minutes, add to that 3 PF's capable of starting, 3 SF's (for now, is the wiz gonna stay?) and 4 PG'S (i like tierre browns game, loves to push the ball) then u see what i mean.
    I'm sure i've missed out some other players, sorry bout that, too many to mention, hence the name of the post.
     
  6. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,945
    a deep team has two serviceable players at every position. by serviceable, i mean able to play 12 minutes or more per game.

    when a team is "stacked" at one position, it is because they have 3.

    C: ming-cato

    not collier

    PF: moT, griff, kt = STACKED

    SF: rice-nachbar-Tmo = STACKED

    SG: cat

    PG: steve, mooch

    thats our 12 man line-up.

    it is safe to say that our fowards are stacked. even if glen rice went down or you dont think Tmo is serviceable, we still have griff and kt that can slide to SF. that kind of reasurance means that they are stacked.

    this summer, seeing tierre and tito go at eachother head to head to make the team will be more interesting than last years NBA finals. assuming we sign one, our PG's will be stacked.
     
  7. 4chuckie

    4chuckie Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 1999
    Messages:
    3,300
    Likes Received:
    2
    "SF: rice-nachbar-Tmo = STACKED "

    Rice = If he's healthy and can return to his form 3 years ago he's a good offensive player, who doesn't play D.

    Nachbar = Rookie, don't count on anything quite yet

    Tmo = At least Stevie likes him. Didn't show much last year.

    Walt = Very Streaky, when's he's on he is a very good offensive player, but like Rice doesn't play D.

    I don't exactly think those 4 (I'm sure 1 will get moved) exactly scares too many teams with matchups. We may be deep at the position but we don't have a solid SF (maybe Rice if healthy).
     
  8. micah1j

    micah1j Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    2,635
    Likes Received:
    61
    4Chuckie,

    Walt is not on the team. He is not under contract anymore.
     
  9. DearRock

    DearRock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2001
    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    If the definition of stacked is 3 serviceable players (12+ mnutes )at a position, then this team is clearly stacked. Why would Collier not be able to play 12 minutes per game? Why not Torres? Why not T. Brown? I would not say that the pick of Maddox is an indicment on Brown. Just like the selection of Brown last year was not an indictment on Jones who ended up being a serviceable point guard in Detriot.
     
  10. bwarren

    bwarren Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would be willing to bet that Oscar may be out in favor of Tito Maddox, and Tierre may be kept instead... afterall, Maddox is 6'4" and is definately a scorer when needed. That sounds an aweful lot like a SG with some great ball handling skills (much like Mobley). With Steve's questionable health at times, it would certainly benefit the Rockets to go with Maddox and Tierre Brown, rather than try to hold onto Torres (although I would not have a problem at all with Oscar sitting on the IR at the start of the season).
     
  11. Yetti

    Yetti Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    9,567
    Likes Received:
    508
    4chuckie have you been away from it all? We have a very solid SF in Nachbar he is our SF for years to come!
     
  12. 4chuckie

    4chuckie Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 1999
    Messages:
    3,300
    Likes Received:
    2
    JWD-
    I've come to learn that you don't count on rookies, some pan out some don't. I wouldn't bet Nachbar will be our SF for the next 8 years.
    At the same time (I know contradicting myself) I am counting on Ming as a rookie.

    As for depth well sometimes it works (Dallas) and sometimes it doesn't (Portland). Great players (top 5 in the league ala MJ, Dream, Duncan, Shaq) win Championships in this league not necessarily the best teams.
     
  13. Darth West

    Darth West Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2002
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can't see how you can consider the rockets a deep team ... tons of potential sure ... but deep? ... You have a good PG, a decent SG, 3 intriguing, but non proven, young players at SF/PF/C ... some of the other players are decent but nothing special ... if the rockets are as deep as you say how come they imploded last year when you had some injuries?

    I belive that one priority for Huston over the next couple of seasons is to get better and reasonably priced (!) backups so you can afford paying Francis, Griffin et al ... right now you have 17 million (02/03) - 22 million (05/06) per year tied up in Taylor, Cato and Norris ... :eek: ... that won't be possible in the future if you want too keep your younger players ...
     
  14. HoRockets

    HoRockets Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    827
    Likes Received:
    0
    PG- Francis, Moochie, Madox
    SG- Cuttino, Torres
    SF- *Lewis, Nachbar, Morris
    PF- Taylor, Griffin
    C- Ming, Cato

    *KT & Rice = Trade for Rashard Lewis
     
  15. Live

    Live Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2000
    Messages:
    2,025
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good point, Darth West.

    The Rockets definitely have a talented roster loaded with potential, but to call them 'Deep' is a stretch, nevermind 'Stacked.'

    'Deep' = Solid players (i.e. > 'servicable') throughout the rotation.

    'Stacked' = Similar to 'Deep' with several players capable of being solid to good starters.

    Let Nachbar, Yao, and Griffin develop offensive games and establish themselves first before the 'Deep' or 'Stacked' label is thrown around.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now