1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Jake Marisnick suspended 2 games

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by tellitlikeitis, Jul 11, 2019.

  1. Houstunna

    Houstunna The Most Unbiased Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2013
    Messages:
    33,280
    Likes Received:
    24,255
    It's far from ludicrous for Jake to be suspended. Everyone here would call for it if the teams were switched. Two games ain't ****, likely only one after the appeal. No biggie

    #AlvarezCF
     
    CheezeyBoy22 and Major like this.
  2. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,172
    Likes Received:
    112,817
    No joke, Joe Torre should know that Marisnick sucks at making contact... no way that was intentional.
     
  3. Fulgore

    Fulgore Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    16,232
    Likes Received:
    14,911
    BS call
     
    Hemo_jr likes this.
  4. bobrek

    bobrek Politics belong in the D & D

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 1999
    Messages:
    36,288
    Likes Received:
    26,639
    #ThatWouldBeFun
     
  5. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,172
    Likes Received:
    112,817
    The league needs to be very clear about the rule because there have been numerous players that have said they do not understand the rule.

    Also, Molina keeps saying "slide"......... how about the catcher get out of the way if they do not want to be ran over in front of home plate. It should be a two way street, the catcher can always just tag the runner.
     
    CheezeyBoy22 likes this.
  6. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    17,437
    Likes Received:
    13,329
    How has the rule concerning catchers not blocking the plate without the ball not already determined fault here? Jake clearly got to the catcher before he got the ball. Why isnt this one and done right there? What the f#ck does base-running intention have to do with it when a standing rule was violated before the contact? What meaning does the rule have if it doesn't apply to this?
     
    CheezeyBoy22 likes this.
  7. HTM

    HTM Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2013
    Messages:
    6,493
    Likes Received:
    4,715
    Lucroy wasn't blocking the plate though... where Jake contacts him is several steps inside the base path.... if Jake had just run down the line he wouldn't have contacted Lucroy (certainly wouldn't have contacted him he did)

    I know Jake was making a split second decision and I don't think he was trying to hurt Lucroy.... All I'm saying is this isn't an example of a catcher attempting to block the runner from touching the plate by being all over the plate..
     
  8. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,416
    Likes Received:
    15,852
    The entirety of Lucroy's body was inside the line the entirety of the play, meaning Jake always had the outside available. Lucroy's tag attempt would have been a swipe tag if Jake hadn't come inside.

    As far as the suspension goes, intent is not really the issue - it's whether the play was dangerous. Flagrant fouls in basketball, yellow cards in soccer, hits against defenseless receivers, etc aren't usually intentional - they are just players being a bit reckless and doing things that risk injuries that the leagues want to avoid. Jake was reckless when he decided to launch himself based on a guess that another player would move from where they were, regardless of whether he intended to hit Lucroy.
     
    Nook likes this.
  9. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,416
    Likes Received:
    15,852
    Lucroy wasn't remotely blocking the plate. His entire body was inside the basepath, meaning the entire outside lane was open. Lucroy was exactly where he should have been.
     
  10. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    17,437
    Likes Received:
    13,329
    Not by being all over the plate, but he sure attempted to block Jake's path to it.
     
    Hemo_jr likes this.
  11. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,416
    Likes Received:
    15,852
  12. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    17,437
    Likes Received:
    13,329
    Maybe its my aging eyes, but it looked to me like Jake fainted outside first, then darted inside. A split second later, Lucroy darted inside. The entire outside wasnt open initially. Only after Lucroy went towards the ball and Jake on the inside.

    Ill admit there is more than one way to interpret the video footage. Just my take.
     
    Hemo_jr likes this.
  13. T for 3

    T for 3 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    5,762
    Likes Received:
    7,996
    Might as well start suspending players who injure fans with foul balls, too.
     
    Hemo_jr likes this.
  14. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    17,437
    Likes Received:
    13,329
  15. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    23,939
    Likes Received:
    14,010
    Marisnick's "mistake" is he changed his path. Once he did that, he opened himself up for interpretation. While I don't think Marisnick changed his path to make the collision, he made the choice to change his path and he was really wrong about where Lucroy would be. I hate when "intent" is part of the rule as it puts Torre in mind reader mode. It would be simpler to if rule just said if you deviate path and make a strong collision with catcher, you're out.

    Regarding Lucroy, I don't see how he's not getting same suspension from a rule perspective. It really looks like he knew Marisnick had chosen to go inside and went to block the inside part of plate completely. While I think intent on Marisnick to make contact is murky, I don't see how Lucroy is giving his best effort not to make a forcible collision. He turned a side swipe into a head-on devastation. Someone should tell him that while Marisnick is a defensive specialist, he's a big dude.
     
    Nook likes this.
  16. Nick

    Nick Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    48,114
    Likes Received:
    14,341
    If Chrinos was the one who got hurt, everybody in here complaining would be demanding blood...
     
    CheezeyBoy22 likes this.
  17. T for 3

    T for 3 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    5,762
    Likes Received:
    7,996
    I see where you are coming from...I'm not sure though. if I saw that the opposing player was as visibly shaken up and remorseful as Jake was after the play, I'd like to think I woudn't be demanding blood.....
     
  18. juicystream

    juicystream Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    29,288
    Likes Received:
    5,401


    Lucroy isn't doing anything illegal (a path to home is there, other than Lucroy's foot), but he is moving back into the baseline as Marisnick makes his move, but then plants and lunges forward to try and catch the ball. Marisnick certainly looks like he is about to dive head first and then tries to stop and spin away from plunging into Lucroy.

    At the end of the day, only Marinick can say for sure if it was intentional to break up the play or not. Only way to 100% prevent this play from being questionable is to require the fielder to not be in the vicinity at all (never going to happen since you need it for rundowns and plays at the plate to be exciting), or to require base runners take a direct route to the base, which is not required until Lucroy catches the ball, which he never does.
     
  19. mikol13

    mikol13 Protector of the Realm
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    13,795
    Likes Received:
    27,188


    Jake is such a good dude, he’s clearly bothered by what happened. I’ll never be convinced that this was intentional.
     
    Chilly_Pete and HTown2017Champs like this.
  20. juicystream

    juicystream Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    29,288
    Likes Received:
    5,401
    I wouldn't want blood. I would also assume the runner was safe (the Angels broadcasters sure did).

    The biggest difference is I'd be happy the runner was called out, and maybe change my opinion on intent.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now