1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

If it had been Battier for Haddidi & Draft Pick instead of Thabeet & Pick

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Liberon, May 13, 2011.

  1. Liberon

    Liberon Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    8,838
    Likes Received:
    842
    I don't know about you guys but Haddidi playing alongside Hayes while gaining an edge by playing against him in practice would probably have helped. The guy clearly can somewhat contribute and had playoff minutes. He's more than ready to contribute and would have helped against tall teams like the Kings and Sixers that help put away our PlayOff hopes.
     
  2. Kam

    Kam Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2002
    Messages:
    30,476
    Likes Received:
    1,322
    Liberon are you Iranian by chance?
     
  3. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    42,540
    Likes Received:
    5,939
    He's better than Thabeet but that is saying absolutely nothing.
     
  4. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    46,837
    Likes Received:
    18,556
    Haddidi has zero ceiling. Thabeet has a chance to do something and has better tools than him.
     
  5. Liberon

    Liberon Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    8,838
    Likes Received:
    842
    No and why would you factor that? Did you see the Memphis/San Antonio series or the limited action Haddidi had the ability to contribute in his limited action. On our team a guy like that with some Chuck Haye's lovin would be competent enough to start. How long has it been that we even had a 7'2 guy that could substantially contribute? Hasheem Thabeet is at least another 2-3 years from where Haddidi is right now. Factor that bro.
     
  6. ashishduh

    ashishduh Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,980
    Likes Received:
    61
    Why would they trade their young backup C AND a pick for an old/expiring 3rd string SF?

    Think of Thabeet as payment for getting a draft pick and think of Battier as mainly being included for salary purposes. It's basically a smaller version of the Baron Davis for Mo Williams deal, the Rockets bought a pick for the cost of Thabeet's contract. For this reason I can pretty much guarantee his option will not be picked up.
     
  7. Liberon

    Liberon Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    8,838
    Likes Received:
    842
    Maybe but it might never materialize. Haddidi could have at least made it interesting and the guy is pretty young too just turned 26 I believe.
     
  8. emjohn

    emjohn Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    12,132
    Likes Received:
    567
    I would have far preferred we worked out Battier for Perkins.

    The Thabeet deal was horrendous. I'm pretty sure they could have bought a non-lottery draft pick for less than the $5M we'll be wasting next season.

    Maybe the lockout will kill next year, and we get out of his contract that way. That'd be nice.
     
  9. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,570
    It's been 2 seasons, when Yao and Mutombo were playing.
     
  10. Liberon

    Liberon Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    8,838
    Likes Received:
    842
    Im just really desperate for a big. We have Chuck Hayes and Patterson, now just imagine a much taller guy that just needs to learn a thing or 2 about the post game. He would be blocking up high and getting amazing putbacks while Chuck helps seal the paint by blocking out and doing his thing. We definitely would have made the playoffs with a competent big. Aaron Gray, Haddidi, insert some more. We have a stingy owner and questionable GM that could not get that big that mediocrity teams much poorer or under the same financial constraints could do. Hornets,Bulls, etc.. They were much better than us prior to last summer.
     
  11. ashishduh

    ashishduh Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,980
    Likes Received:
    61
    5 mil is chump change unless you're talking about the cap. And if so, who cares about the cap this season? Not only are there no good FAs this year but we don't even know what the new CBA holds. For all we know, if we had let Battier expire we might still be basically capped.

    I'm sure they'll do the smart thing and decline all the options on our 3 garbage 2009 lotto picks and we'll be swimming in cap space for 2012.
     
  12. Russjr2

    Russjr2 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,776
    Likes Received:
    1,137
    What if Memphis didn't want to give him up? What if they saw he could contribute a little bit and maybe more after a year or so?

    It's not as easy as just saying we should have gotten 'this' player instead of 'that' player in the trade. Teams know what kind of tlent they have and what they want to keep. I see that all the time on this board. Keep it realistic. We are not the only people that watch the players play and can see if they have talent.
     
  13. Liberon

    Liberon Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    8,838
    Likes Received:
    842
    We are the only team in mediocrity that has a much richer owner yet can't acquire a 7fter that can contribute substantially. We fail to do it season after season. Anybody would be something. You don't notice this awful trend?
     
  14. Kojirou

    Kojirou Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,180
    Likes Received:
    281
    I have no idea why one benchwarmer big is so much better than the other benchwarmer big, especially when the second benchwarmer big has a much higher potential than the first one. I mean, we get Haddadi. Then what? You really think that's going to change anything, or that playing Haddadi or Aaron Gray over Hayes is what's going to get us into the playoffs? Get real.
     
  15. Liberon

    Liberon Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    8,838
    Likes Received:
    842
    Play over Hayes? Can you read? I clearly mention that it would be alongside Hayes. Hayes would be moved to the 4.
     
  16. ashishduh

    ashishduh Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,980
    Likes Received:
    61
    You should go look up the phrase "season after season".
     
  17. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    42,540
    Likes Received:
    5,939
    Your notion that Haddidi could "contribute substantially" is flawed. At 26, he won't get any better. If the Rockets want to improve, they need to acquire non-scrub players.
     
  18. Kojirou

    Kojirou Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,180
    Likes Received:
    281
    And Scola? Don't tell me that you're not going to play Scola because he's an iffy defender. As the Grizzlies can tell you right now, having an offense in the post is pretty important, and a Hayes-Haddadi frontcourt would be hilarious offensively.

    I am really, really tired of people forgetting about Scola just because he's a bit old and isn't flashy. He's the first great PF we had in a long, long time, and is a worker, and people seriously want to start Hayes over him. It's ridiculous.
     
  19. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    42,540
    Likes Received:
    5,939
    You can't be serious. Why would the Rockets move Chuck to PF to play along with a non-talented C? They would have absolute zero for an inside offense. Chuck can only play PF next to a scoring C (like Yao). We have PFs like Patterson and Scola on the roster, rememeber?

    The day the Rockets play Haddidi at C and waste Hayes at PF will be the day they start tanking for the #1 pick.
     
  20. Liberon

    Liberon Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    8,838
    Likes Received:
    842
    As quick as he is with his hands and feet, you don't think Chuck could be the starting enforcing defensive 3 ala a Ron Artest but better? Martin is such an efficient 2 we don't need much scoring from the 3.

    Haddidi/Gray - 5
    Scola - 4
    Hayes - 3
    Martin - 2
    Lowry - 1

    We are in the PlayOffs.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now