1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[HOPE KEPT ALIVE] The Impeachment Trial of Donald John Trump

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by SamFisher, Dec 18, 2019.

  1. Aleron

    Aleron Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    11,685
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    Stick to the selective out of context leaking, push it to censure, if they believed it mattered beyond there, wait for the subpoenas to play out, and don't trap themselves into the impeachment course until they had something that could play with those outside their bubble.
     
  2. SamFisher

    SamFisher Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    58,921
    Likes Received:
    36,482
    Also, the Rockets should take the mid range shots when they go in.
     
  3. SamFisher

    SamFisher Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    58,921
    Likes Received:
    36,482
  4. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    54,447
    Likes Received:
    54,359
    A more fitting place couldn't exist for senator cruz to lay out his plan... fox & friends. I guess Barney's Playhouse was already booked...

     
  5. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    24,002
    Likes Received:
    19,913
    If you are plugged into the progressive caucus you know this wouldn’t fly. They were just about ready to turn hard on Pelosi for being weak pushing against Trump and using their power. It would have been politically untenable from the left to look political and like a weak moderate in response to something this blatant.

    I think many don’t really realize that the left has a base voter too. That base has a need now to feel like their voice matters and wants to fight for what they see as a moment of crisis.
     
    JayGoogle, quikkag and RayRay10 like this.
  6. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,182
    Likes Received:
    112,835
    LMFAO
     
  7. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    24,002
    Likes Received:
    19,913
    This guy literally took to the stage at the nomination and told the crowd and voter to basically vote for Hillary. We all know he would vote all day every day to make Pence president if he could get away with it politically. The man is a joke and debases himself every time he speaks.
     
    Deckard, REEKO_HTOWN, quikkag and 3 others like this.
  8. DaDakota

    DaDakota If you want to know, just ask!

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    124,103
    Likes Received:
    32,987
    Nope, they STOOD up for integrity and honor.

    DD
     
    daywalker02, quikkag and vlaurelio like this.
  9. Rashmon

    Rashmon Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2000
    Messages:
    19,264
    Likes Received:
    14,484
  10. TheresTheDagger

    Joined:
    May 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,099
    Likes Received:
    7,741
    [​IMG]
     
    Nook and B-Bob like this.
  11. AleksandarN

    AleksandarN Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,452
    Likes Received:
    5,866
    Morally? Really? Lmao.
     
  12. No Worries

    No Worries Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    30,110
    Likes Received:
    17,014
    Trump is setting PRs in the amount of tweeting he has done leading into the impeachment. Any guesses how this ends if Pelosi keeps the House investigating (Bolton, Parnas, Rudy G, Tricky Micky) until the Senate promises to hold a real trial.

    Pelosi should hold out for all of the witnesses to testify, including the Criminal in Chief.

    You never know the House might add articles of impeachment if the Senate drags their feet long enough. This Sh*t Show may never end.
     
    Deckard, B-Bob, RayRay10 and 2 others like this.
  13. Corrosion

    Corrosion Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    8,931
    Likes Received:
    11,381

    That's not altogether true.

    During Watergate , Nixon did the same invoking executive privilege and the House took it to the courts and eventually the SCOTUS …. Nixon was eventually forced to comply.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege#United_States_v._Nixon




    The Dems dropped the ball on this particular charge not getting the courts involved.
     
    #73 Corrosion, Dec 19, 2019
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2019
    Andre0087 likes this.
  14. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    24,002
    Likes Received:
    19,913
    It took 8 months to even get an appeals court ruling on Don McGahn... 8 months. To get Mulvaney and Bolton to testify it would have easily been 2021 before SCOTUS would be ruling on those cases.

    Do you honestly mean to tell me after how over the top critical you’ve been the past few days that you wouldn’t have been complaining about the Dems stretching impeachment out into an election had they gone this route?

    Also you had public statements by people like Mulvaney and Guilianni as well as the ability to have Chief Justice Roberts preside over the trial to make rulings on subpoenas on the spot.

    The House acts as a prosecutor. The Senate acts as the trial jury. Prosecutors charge a crime when they have enough evidence to make a case. Making this statement shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the impeachment process.
     
  15. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    54,447
    Likes Received:
    54,359
    Different time, different court.
     
    B-Bob likes this.
  16. Corrosion

    Corrosion Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    8,931
    Likes Received:
    11,381

    If they don't send it to the Senate …. what's the point of it all ? Have they done their duty by impeaching but failing to follow thru and seek a removal (however unlikely)? What were you telling me last week - They have to do their constitutional duty!

    Moral victory or not …. Trump's still POTUS and would be the first impeached president to seek re-election. Is this nothing more than Nancy putting a nasty stain on Trump in hopes it affects his re-election ?!

    This just has the appearance of playing games …. **** or get off the pot.



    I don't know - I don't see her angle here but find it hard to underestimate Nancy …. she's good at politics , like her or not.

    Could she be planning to hold them beyond the election , should Trump win and the Senate flip in 2021 ….
     
    #76 Corrosion, Dec 19, 2019
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2019
  17. DaDakota

    DaDakota If you want to know, just ask!

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    124,103
    Likes Received:
    32,987
    Add the fraud with the charity.

    DD
     
  18. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    72,919
    Likes Received:
    111,107
    Mildly entertaining and I hope overwhelmingly passive-aggressive enough to pass the @LosPollosHermanos Passive-Aggressive Threshold Test™ :

    https://hotair.com/archives/jazz-shaw/2019/12/19/pelosi-turns-impeachment-circus-even-comedy/

    Pelosi turns impeachment circus into even more of a comedy
    Jazz ShawPosted at 8:01 am on December 19, 2019

    Ed suggested this maneuver was on the way yesterday and now it appears that Speaker Pelosi has decided on the lame explanation the Democrats will hang their hats on. In order to attempt to give Chuck Schumer some “leverage” in the impeachment trial, the Speaker may refuse to send the articles of impeachment to the upper chamber, dragging all of this nonsense out even further. (Associated Press)

    When I turned on CNN this morning, the anchors were desperately trying to explain why the Constitution doesn’t demand the Speaker send the articles of impeachment to the Senate. That’s technically true, but the Constitution doesn’t really “demand” much of anything, other than requiring the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to preside when the President is on trial.

    As far as the responsibilities of the House go, Article I Section 2 simply says, “The House of Representatives shall choose their speaker and other officers; and shall have the sole power of impeachment.”

    The Founding Fathers didn’t provide all that much more in terms of instructions for the Senate. Article I Section 3 reads, “The Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments. When sitting for that purpose, they shall be on oath or affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two thirds of the members present.”

    At no point does the Constitution even mention that there have to be “articles” delivered to the Senate. All of those details aren’t even technically laws. They are found in the rules each chamber establishes for themselves. You can read the Senate rules for impeachment here. The technicality Pelosi is relying on is the caveat in Section I about impeachment managers. It reads, “whensoever the Senate shall receive notice from the House of Representatives that managers are appointed on their part to conduct an impeachment against any person and are directed to carry articles of impeachment to the Senate, the Secretary of the Senate shall immediately inform the House of Representatives that the Senate is ready to receive the managers for the purpose of exhibiting such articles of impeachment, agreeably to such notice.”

    The clear implication is that it is the duty of the House to dispatch the managers once the impeachment vote is concluded. But if they drag their feet too long for political purposes, Article I of the Constitution informs us of another important point. “Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings.” The Senate can either modify their rules or if push comes to shove, ignore them and get on with business.

    But these are still all hypothetical arguments at this point. Who really benefits by delaying the process? I suppose some of the Democrats might be operating on the theory that the longer they can keep impeachment in the news, the worse it is for Trump. But as we’ve been seeing for the past couple of weeks, the public has largely grown tired of this show and impeachment is growing less and less popular by the week.

    Further, there are some Senators currently running for President who probably don’t want to be tied down in Washington to take care of this trial when they’d rather be scrounging for votes in Iowa and New Hampshire. This looks more like a case of shooting themselves in the foot than anything else.

    What should be obvious to all at this point is that the Democrats aren’t serious about this and haven’t been from the beginning. All the cries about how impeachment was imperative and “we must act now” go out the window when the Speaker decides to just slam the brakes on everything until they can try to rig the trial in the Senate the way they did in the House. And that’s simply not going to happen on Cocaine Mitch’s watch.

    Meanwhile, Schumer will try to “drive a wedge” between Republicans, or at least that’s his current strategy. Good luck with that, Chuck. Let us know how it works out for you. The clown car is fully gassed up and ready to go.

     
    cml750 likes this.
  19. SamFisher

    SamFisher Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    58,921
    Likes Received:
    36,482
    Nice, a white supremacist clown reference and "gassing" all about a Jewish New York Senator, all one sentence.

    Are you not mildly entertained, American jews?
     
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  20. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    72,919
    Likes Received:
    111,107
    that's certainly a creative take!!
     
    cml750 and TheresTheDagger like this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now