Thanks for pointing this out... I was thinking that cut/open market signing scenario would be the best situation, so this really cleared things up for me. $14m for 1 year of Romo, no strings attached beyond that? Seems like a no-brainer. Ship the 4th or 5th round pick their way (Rick Smith would end up wasting that pick anyways).
Simple answer to his trade offer just draft a QB ie D Watson , P Mahomes it solves the problem at Qb .
It's actually an "alternate fact" - he's won two. And wins are not a fair, or valid, individual measurement, anyway. He's been very good in three of his last four playoff games, including the loss in Green Bay on the overturned Bryant touchdown.
The suggestion is that if the Texans had Romo, they'd have more success than Romo has ever managed in his career....that's why people bring up his failures in the playoffs. Since people are only measuring the Texans based on "winz" then it's fair to measure Romo on "winz". Either way, the whole Romo nonsense was good for a laugh at first, but now it's reaching the level of the "Texans should get Brett Favre" nonsense several years back. I don't doubt that Romo would do amazing in the one quarter of football he played before getting injured, but in no way would he help the Texans get where they want to go.
