"Get Red"-y for Nash?

Good post and argument, worzel. I need to see more of the Brooks/Lowry duo before I can commit to backing a move like this. Making a play for Nash would be the epitome of a "win now" move yet it seems like every single time we make a move using that philosophy it never plays out that way (i.e. Battier, Artest, Francis, etc.) due to whatever the circumstance may be. With our luck Nash would sign then suffer a career ending injury two days after the trade deadline.

 

Let's get Deron!!!!!

He's my perfect PG

 

YES NASH PLEASE!

 

Looks like we'd have to trade too many players to get him. Why do that when you can just sign a FA point guard like Mike Bibby, who already knows Adelman's system?

 

I agree. Back in his MVP days, his offensive abilities overshadowed his extreme defensive deficiency, but not now. Nash fits better in a running style offense, but one in which we will not run with Yao here.

 

Someone said Bibby, I agree I would much rather have Bibby and it's more likely really.

 

Q: What PG did Aaron Brooks have his best career offensive game against?

A: Steve Nash

Over 35 PG that can't play a lick of defense, no thank you. I would be more intrigued in converting Tmac to a starting PG than signing Nash. If Tmac is OK with it, Tmac starting at PG might be a way to make the Artest/Tmac combo work.

 

Do not want Nash. Thanks.