1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Feigen] Bonzi undecided, set to meet with Rockets on Tuesday (Hayes Mention)

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by NIKEstrad, May 27, 2007.

  1. Man

    Man Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2003
    Messages:
    2,945
    Likes Received:
    13
    definitely keep Hayes!
    someone else will take him.
     
  2. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,065
    Likes Received:
    3,786
    They didn't go to camp thinking Hayes would start. The Rockets went into camp last year with the expectation Battier would start at the 4.

    If they had realized the Battier experiment at the 4 would be abandoned quickly, things may have worked out differently.
     
  3. Yaozer

    Yaozer Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,392
    Likes Received:
    2
    I like Hayes coming off the bench, but not as a starter. Saying Hayes was one of the top defensive 4's is just ridiculous. Hayes doesn't deserve that much credit. Did you not forget about his constant foul troubles? The guy clearly has a LOT to improve.
     
  4. durvasa

    durvasa Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,011
    Likes Received:
    15,481
    Somebody name a PF out there that they'd like to see start for us next season. Someone that we actually have a chance of acquiring, please. Only then does it make sense to argue over who shouldn't start.
     
  5. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,570
    Whether Hayes starts or not is irrelevant. He is useful for about 20 mpg either way. He's VERY helpful during this time, but after that, his fouls and energy starts hurtintg his effectiveness in many games.

    I am convinced Hayes has a role to play for this team is Adelman can see past his lack of a jump shot. Unlike most of the rebound/defense specialists, Chuck actually has very good basketball IQ and would be good at a ball-sharing offense.
     
  6. durvasa

    durvasa Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,011
    Likes Received:
    15,481
    You can't sum up a player's defensive contributions by just looking at an opposing player's PPG. Particularly in JVG's system where the PF has a significant team defensive role. You can take any great defender by reputation and pick out a handful of opponents who exceeded his averages against him. That doesn't prove anything.

    Our team defense was consistently better with Chuck Hayes on the floor. Far better. That's even taking into account opponents we faced and teammates he played with. And that pattern held throughout the season and postseason. It simply can't be seriously discounted as a fluke. Chuck Hayes has many limitations, but if nothing else he is a very good defensive player. I can understand why that would be difficult to swallow for someone who apparently thinks basketball is simply the sum of 5 one-on-one matchups on the floor.
     
  7. GATER

    GATER Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    A "very good defensive player" and "the 2nd best defensive 4 in the league"...better than Garnett..are two vastly different viewpoints.

    I don't care about Hollinger's opinion, PER's, plus/minus from 82 games or $Ball. If the Rockets were in the WC Finals with a one point lead and Tim Duncan with the ball and the game on the line with the floor spread...I'll take at a minimum the defense of Garnett, Dwight Howard, Rasheed Wallace, Okafor and Brand, That's 6 off the top of my head. You could probably make a case for Shawn Marion and David West.

    If Hayes is that freakin' good at defense, he'll get half an MLE, right?
     
  8. TTRocket

    TTRocket Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,341
    Likes Received:
    3
    I think Hayes is a very good man to man defender. He is only 6'6, shorter than our backup SG (Kirk Snyder) yet I have never seen him get abused in the post. He also shut Okur down in the playoffs with his quickness, and did a MUCH better job on Boozer than Yao did.

    However, he is a zero on offense and is a TERRIBLE rebounder/shotblocker. In Game 7 he got a grand total of 2 rebounds in 30 minutes of play. He in no shape or form is better than guys like Garnett, Brand, Wallace etc who have the complete package of man to man defense, rebounding AND scoring.

    As to what Chuck's role on the team is, there should definitely be a place for him. We should be looking for a starting PF that has skills that Chuck does not have-namely rebounding and being able to score more than wide open layups.
     
  9. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,065
    Likes Received:
    3,786
    And in game 2 he got 12 rebounds in 27 minutes. Hayes has been a pretty good rebounder in college, the NBDL, and yes, the NBA.

    Ben Wallace got 0 rebounds in 20 minutes on November 24.

    Using 1 game to call a guy a terrible rebounder is silly.
     
  10. TTRocket

    TTRocket Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,341
    Likes Received:
    3
    I used 1 game as an example, not as proof. Rafer Alston was our 2nd leading rebounder behind Yao over the course of the 7 game Utah series. That IMHO is a strong indictment of our frontline's (Hayes and Howard) ability to rebound. BTW forcing guards to hit the defensive boards hard makes it difficult to score easy fastbreak pts. We need a starting PF that is taller than our backup SG next year in the rotation.

    PS. Ben Wallace getting 0 rebounds in some meaningless game on Nov 24 is a lot more acceptable than getting 2 rebounds in GAME 7 when the season is on the line!
     
  11. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,065
    Likes Received:
    3,786
    Dirk scored 8 points in an elimination game. Is he a terrible scorer?

    Utah happens to be an outstanding team. Hayes also spent most of his time guarding Okur out on the perimeter. He had a bad rebounding game, no doubt, but you don't have the 12th best rebounding rate in the league by accident.

    Rafer also played 44 minutes a game, which helped him achieve those rebounding numbers. And the Nets, with one of the best fastbreak point guards in the league, won a playoff series with their point guard leading the team in rebounding.

    Would you prefer Mo Taylor rebounding? He's taller than Snyder.
     
    #91 NIKEstrad, May 29, 2007
    Last edited: May 29, 2007
  12. TTRocket

    TTRocket Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,341
    Likes Received:
    3
    Dirk was swarmed by the defense, being the superstar that he is. He has also gotten a lot of criticism for his pitiful performance. Did people say "Hey, it was just one game, he is still a great scorer!"? No, rather they said the MVP award this year is travesty. The playoffs are where you prove your worth, Dirk has proven himself time and time in the past, Hayes so far has NOT. Big difference.

    That being said, I do agree with your point about Hayes being on the perimeter. This may have been a factor in why he was outrebounded by Skip to my Lou. However, it still doesn't explain why his perimeter counterpart Okur outrebounded him consistently at 8.1 rb/game. Okur isn't known for his rebounding, yet he outrebounded Hayes, whose ONLY job is defense and rebounding.

    In regards to your Rafer comment, he shouldn't be forced to help out the bigs on the board. He should be looking for the quick outlet and fastbreak. Don't compare him to Kidd who is naturally a great rebounder and is able to set up the fast break without a quick outlet. BTW, isn't Kidd taller than Hayes?! Hehe.
     
    #92 TTRocket, May 29, 2007
    Last edited: May 29, 2007
  13. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    42,524
    Likes Received:
    5,927
    This means almost nothing because the alternative was Juwan Howard. It's just like we found out how much better we were with Rafer when he got thrown out of a game. When your backups are totally pathetic, it makes the starter look better than they are. Both Chuck and Rafer need to be outta here or made into the 2nd or 3rd string players they really are. There is no fluke because the explanation is very simple.

    I'll give you this: Chuck has room for improvement. He is so unskilled on offense he can't go anywhere but up. How much he improves over the summer remains to be seen. He makes Otis Thorpe look like Dr.J.
     
  14. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,065
    Likes Received:
    3,786
    Okur wasn't a factor on the offensive boards for most of the series. He got 0 offensive rebounds in game 7 - notable, in that he's gotten at least 1 in every other game in the playoffs, including 2 or more in every game of the Golden State and San Antonio series to date.

    Okur was out of the picture for offensive rebounds because of Hayes -- and he's been a pretty good offensive rebounder for his career (2+ per game, ~30th in the league this year in that category). Okur may not be known for his rebounding, but that doesn't mean he's not pretty good at it -- including over 10/game against Golden State.

    In our series, Okur average 10.77 boards per 48 minutes. Hayes averaged 10.9 per 48 minutes. You can't directly compare players who have a disparity in minutes played.

    Baron Davis and Deron Williams also average ~5 rebs a game in the playoffs. And no, Kidd isn't taller than Hayes.

    I'm not here to argue that Chuck Hayes should be a starter. He shouldn't. He has 2 skills that are above average NBA quality -- defense and rebounding. However, that alone is good enough to be a 7th-8th man type bringing energy for 15-20 minutes a game.

    The problem with the team isn't guys like Battier and Hayes -- it's that Battier is the 3rd best player and Hayes is getting close to 30 minutes in the playoffs because our other options suck.
     
    #94 NIKEstrad, May 29, 2007
    Last edited: May 29, 2007
  15. Hayesfan

    Hayesfan Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    10,900
    Likes Received:
    360
    Not that I am excusing Chuck's one bad rebounding game.. but Okur was guarding Yao on defense which allowed him to be close to the basket for defensive rebounds. So you are comparing apples to oranges.

    Did Okur get more offensive rebounds? No, he didn't... which means even if Chuck wasn't getting the defensive rebounds off a Utah shot, Okur wasn't getting to the basket to get them either.

    Watch Utah boxing out Chuck on the Rockets offensive end in the last three games of that series... they were literally holding his arm down to keep him away from the ball. If I recall correctly Boozer got like 4 defensive rebounds over/around Chuck by doing that. He would hold Chuck's arm with one hand until he was ready to jump for the ball, taking away any advantage of Chuck's speed to get around him to the ball.

    Okur had zero offensive rebounds in that last game.... Boozer on the other hand had 4 offensive rebounds... and Matt Harpring had 3... so someone wasn't boxing those two out at all on the offensive end.

    In fact, if we want to get down to it... Yao only had 6 rebounds in that last game. Does that mean we need a better rebounding center?

    I guess my point is, that yes you all are right, no matter how you look at it, a more athletic PF is needed, but to discount what good things that Chuck did for this team last season is uncalled for.

    Edit: I should have waited.. lol Nike and I said basically the same thing.
     
  16. Barkley

    Barkley Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,120
    Likes Received:
    0
    So there are no information about Bonzi? Will he stay in Houston (I hope so)? I know they should talk today but I cannot find any news:)
     
  17. Amel

    Amel Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    10,528
    Likes Received:
    5,491
    is this you, Van Gundier?
     
  18. justtxyank

    justtxyank Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,722
    Likes Received:
    39,375
    Anyone got an idea about how long it might take to hear that he is opting out?
     
  19. krocket

    krocket Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2003
    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    5
    The only way he will play for the Rox is if he does NOT opt out, IMO. At least that way we will get at least a year's worth of play for 4.5 MM. I have no idea that the Rox will give him MLE to play for us after last year.
     
  20. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,065
    Likes Received:
    3,786
    It's hard to really know what the deadline is. Based on this link about Anthony Carter forgetting to file the paperwork a few years ago (ironically, Bill Duffy was his agent), the deadline is June 30.

    To be clear, "opting out" (free agency) is the default. He has the option to exercise his contract for next year at ~2.2 million. When Rashard Lewis says he's done his paperwork to be a free agent, that's because he had an early-termination clause (where the default is opt in).

    They're meeting today/this week, so we may here something by the end of the week. Otherwise, my guess is we'll know by draft time.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now