How you answer a poll doesn't say you are moderate. The opinions you express on here are far right. Don't try to hide behind some test you answered dishonestly.
I forgot to add the description for my graph: brilliant, excruciatingly handsome centrist handicapped by an over sized penis.
I am a left social libertarian<br>Left: 4, Libertarian: 5.74 Bah, still fairly limited to fit into one of four quadrants and a lot of questions where my answers were "it depends..." Still the poll got close-ish as in my heart I am a libertarian socialist but also pragmatic so my views are divided into "ideal" and "in this country". I nonetheless like to take polls and surveys of all sorts regardless of how much merit they might have. I also enjoy that this thread turned into a forum for everybody to throw down their moderate/sensible bona fides as compared to all of the crazies/idiots around them. I am not moderate. I am an intellectual (and am a snob to those who could but don't) I want "white people" to be bred out of existence. I am an aesthete and a weirdo. So, whatever, no chance of being moderate or centrist for me.
amazing! Draymond Green doesn't need to lift his leg to kick you right there, he will simply step on it in a natural motion
Funny, seems so far we only have one extreme liberal here (FranchiseBlade). Clearly there are more liberals here than conservatives, but they aren't flaming commies, nor are they anything more than mildly authoritarian.
I love how you weak-minded people have to announce you put someone on ignore as if it is some kind of ultimate injury or insult. It's not. I don't have anyone on ignore. that's because I am not weak. I am strong enough not to be affected by what people write on here so much that I need to put them on ignore to make them invisible. I simply can choose not to respond. An amazing concept. But you can be like Bobbythewhatever, and AroundtheMuslims if it makes you happy okiedokie.
Why not just say that you are an Anarchist at heart? Does it sound better to you when you call it Libertarian Socialism? I'll just leave the comment about wanting to "breed out" certain groups of people alone.
Because there are about 100 different ideas and subsets about what anarchism means. I choose libertarian socialist because I believe in democracy, government, social support, etc, just not on a huge state-centric level. The world will be a better place as more people racially mix. It will get rid of "white people" first but that is an outdated 19th century concept that was completely artificial from the beginning, anyway.
Fair enough. Most of the time though the two terms are used to mean the same thing, I was just curious what it meant to you. Okay, just watch out when you get around to "getting rid" of other people though, if you say something like "I want to breed out all of the black people from existence" you'll be forever branded as a racist almost immediately no matter what your intentions are.
