Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
First of all they aren't illegal. They are asylum seekers. If the GOP would vote on the Border bill it allocate more judges, staff, and personnel...
No it is not real.
He is and as was mentioned the executive action won't have the force of law that would be in place if Republicans actually would vote on the bill.
True, but his conviction wasn't part of a campaign to disqualify the Donald.
The only campaign I've seen to disqualify a candidate was from a couple of states. One of which was brought by Republicans. The courts overturned...
Yes. I was never a fan of his, but had no idea about that crazy stuff.
Wow! That's a whole lot of racism there.
From the bits and pieces I've been able to watch, this hearing seems to be a huge dose of backfire to the MAGA GOP party.
Either you believe people deserve to have a trial and have the accusations proven or you don't.
You mentioned about locking people up without a trial as a good thing. You said it was okay because of the crime problems in El Salvador. Either...
So you don't like the American system. Should America have increased criminal activity you are in favor of throwing out the system. Got it.
Are you in favor of throwing out the American system where everyone is entitled to a trial and charges have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt?
So what you are claiming has not actually been shown to be fact as of yet. It is merely listed as a possibility. The treatment has not been worse...
Being overly cautious during a pandemic isn't really one of the threats people need to worry about when it comes to Authoritarianism.
What? The Xeet left out important details about the actual crimes committed? That's so surprising. It's almost as if it was intentionally...
Well if she violated the praying at a clinic federal statute she deserves the death penalty... Either that or this is another in a long line of BS...
Your whole take on the pandemic is revisionist history and selective examples, and flawed studies.
Show me which bench decisions would have been different. Otherwise, it's just meaningless noise.
If anything, his regulations were overly cautious. I don't think more people died from being too cautious. Also that Xeet has no context. Let's...
Which bench rulings were influenced by this?
