Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
Because it's unnecessarily playing with fire, but whatever.
Interesting VRA challenge. I usually see those in the congressional redistricting context. Agreed that if someone organized the Spring Branch...
This is good stuff. You must be like the 1% of the population that follows Texas politics. On a national level, Democratic leaning states like...
It's complicated, but SCOTUS said sure, go ahead states.
Man, Diaz has been really bad for months. Like he shouldn't be high in the PH order in the playoffs.
Yeah, Kavanagh wants to be chief in case Roberts kicks it with a heart attack or Covid or something. So that scenario is possible. Another...
I get what you're saying, but I think availability of broad interpretation was left open purposefully. And there may be a better medium from the...
Thanks. Also, I can't get this clip out of my head: [MEDIA]
So, I'm skimming the Thomas decision on Mahanoy and the first page has 150 historical precedent of supporting the coach, for a guy who doesn't...
According to Geneva Convention ratified by Congress - I think. But of course Title 42 is also a policy. What this man fails to recognize in his...
There was a 1400 roll discrepancy at one point. Texas Republicans were talking about just looking into that issue, but Trump misunderstood and...
Only justification was to go for it on 4th and 1. But no, he was coaching scared, and hoped to pin them. Now the Browns get it on the 20. o_O
It's a muff, but yes, disgusting.
Will reply later, bc you know, football. But you really have like an ultra conservative view about the Constitution in its limited powers. Not...
The Constitution was changed during reconstruction. The entire protection of rights was incorporated to the states via the privileges and...
I'm aware of the case and I think I've read this point from you before. It's not that huge of a stretch when there's Filburn as precedent. Of...
This is a fair take, but there needs to be balance. Many of these cases aren't black and white. Swinging the pendulum too often in close...
He is partisan as hell, and he's the only justice that doesn't care about precedence. Pretty sure he argues that it means nothing to him.
Pretty sure he means judicial interpretation of any substantive rights in general, which means things like gay marriage, the right not to be...
There's a thread. You may have the OP on ignore or something.
