Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
four times. A lot of folks watching bad baseball for a "not baseball town". Indeed. Indeed, indeed. Just wanted to repeat everything you...
where were you the other 209,238,298 this has been refuted?
I don't find it funny at all. This was a model franchise from the mid-90s for at least a decade. :(
meh. that would include 6 or 12 losses against the br*ves, and that's completely unacceptable.
are you a Cubbies fan? if so, please don't take my Cub hate personal. Good luck next year in the Senior Circuit. Wish my team could stay there...
bah. I'd rather see the Cubs 18 times a year than the A's and Mariners.
cuck the fubs.
yes, that's it. What other explanation could there possibly be for someone voicing a viewpoint other than your own? Mercy, this thread has a...
Conversations wander by nature, because people naturally connect ideas. Whining about that is stupid.
...only for Nintendo-brains.
I wonder how much of that may also have to do with the NL having more doormats during that time period?
maybe. I'm too lazy to see if the numbers were more even in the 90s than they were through the 00s and so far in the 01s. at any rate, screw the...
...they only get to use their half-players for half the games. The other half, their pitchers have to actually play *baseball* just like the NL...
The Orioles for like most of the '90s and '00s. Also, at times, the Mets and Dodgers.
Those things are cyclical. The AL teams have had a stronger winning percentage the last decade, but it will swing back, and then back again.
One more thing: bull****. You're trolling a bunch of people and stating that their positions are invalid. Go ahead, freely pop off. But know...
So, our preferences and opinions are invalid while yours are? Or maybe the reasons given are good enough for us? Not worth the time. Clearly...
It's perfect, then.
I haven't looked at the Rangers' and Rays' payroll, but I wouldn't argue that it was luck. I see where you're coming from with regard to teams...
Perhaps. My understanding of parity was that more teams are able to win at elite levels some of the time. So to me the Tigers' and Nationals'...