Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
I think the part he doesn't like is that the sample was intentionally bookended by hot streaks. Like if you have any player who alternates between...
I don't know why you're being so hostile here but how about we just look at 2022-23 instead? Mobley shot 21% on 1.3 per game that year, and the...
Well sure but that's not the point. The point is that "conventional wisdom" and "common sense" type stuff is often wrong, and that we should...
My main takeaway is that the "it's a copycat league" chasers are overrated. Remember in the early 2010s when everyone said the warriors could...
Yeah I agree, that's why I said credit to Ime for the strategy. It's very smart. If we weren't a great offensive rebounding team we'd be one of...
Well there is one reason, and it's the only reason we're a good offensive team at all, it's because of offensive rebounding. We're the #1...
The hype train is back on track and it's full steam ahead. Jorge's gotta be having a bad night. [MEDIA]
Bobby please this is our moment how can you rain on the very parade that you are the conductor of. Have some joy.
46!!! Haters in shambles!!
How dare you
Reed going for 50?! We are so back.
This is legitimately cool that they care about him and are talking about it. That makes me happy to hear. Is there a clip of the dunk?
Reeds box score doesn't add up. 11-24, 5-15 from 3, 3-3 on free throws. That's 30 points but they have him down for 33. Is there a 4 point line in...
I just found a stream and am now learning that the vipers have a guy that's like 5'4. This guy is like a foot shorter than Reed Sheppard.
This isn't a flaw with net rating. This is a presumed flaw in people's analysis of net rating. It is something you clearly have seen, but not...
Okay, but you quoted me specifically and called me out for doing something that I'm not doing. I haven't made any of these assumptions or made any...
But I'm not doing that either. I'm explaining why we use per 100 possessions instead of per 50 or per 200 or per 1. Per 100 is used to normalize...
No it's not. That's just not what net rating is or what net rating is trying to do or say. It doesn't assume any of that. It's just normalizing...
You're conflating two things that have nothing to do with each other. Net rating is not extrapolating, it's normalizing. Nobody is saying that...
No, they wouldn't ever play that long, it's just to help contextualize the numbers. Like if I told you that some lineup has played 561 possessions...
