Who was better in his prime?

wow, i'm going to have to think about that one.

good question

 

Statistically speaking, Coleman was the better player.

 

hard to say, coleman had a more typical career with a peak,plateau, decline...while sheed was more erratic. Sheed also had trouble giving 100% consistently..so it's hard to say when Sheed's prime really was

 

You can't go wrong with either... I give Sheed the edge because of his post D.

 

Coleman was better at his peak. But Wallace had a longer prime.

 

I would take Derrick Coleman at his best vs. Rasheed at his best. Rasheed has had a better career and has been way more consistent with a bigger positive impact on his team than DC ever had. But if we are talking about just one game with each at their very best then I go with DC.

 

Pretty much this. Even in his later years, Coleman was pretty serviceable.

 

This says it all. Coleman could have been a superstar if he wasn't such a knucklehead.