US Copyright Office Legalizes Jailbreaking for iPhone

BleedRocketsRed · Jul 26, 2010

Randomly came across this. Don't think this changes anything lol. Just being safe knowing that there cannot be any legal ramifications. Wonder if this applies to rooting for Android.

http://money.cnn.com/2010/07/26/technology/iphone_jailbreaking/index.htm

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- IPhone users can now legally hack their phones to download applications that aren't in Apple's App Store.

The U.S. Copyright Office, a division of the Library of Congress, has authorized several new exemptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), one of which will allow mobile phone users to "jailbreak" -- or hack into -- their devices to use apps not authorized by the phone's manufacturer. The new rules will be published on Tuesday in the Federal Register.

Jailbreaking iPhones in order to download apps that are unavailable in Apple's App Store had been a legal gray area: Apple technically had the right to request a $2,500 government fine for damages every time a user violated the law that bans "circumvention of technological measures" controlling access to copyrighted works -- in this case, the iPhone's iOS software.

It's unclear if Apple actually ever requested that fine be levied on an iPhone customer. But it fought to preserve its right to: Apple filed an objection last year to the rule the Copyright Office has now adopted.

The Copyright Office's decision means that jailbreakers will not face legal sanctions, but phone makers are still free to fight back technologically against the practice. Apple typically voids the warranty on iPhones that owners have hacked.

The Copyright Office also renewed and expanded its 2006 decision allowing mobile phone users to jailbreak their phones in order to switch carriers. Previously, the office allowed firmware updates to enable network-switching; this week, it added a provision allowing software hacks as well. In other words, iPhone users can now legally download software that will enable their phones to join a non-AT&T (T, Fortune 500) network.

The Copyright Office conducts an extensive rulemaking process every three years to determine what exemptions should be granted to the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions. Each cycle, the office's previous exemptions expire unless they are renewed.

This time around, the Copyright Office granted six exemptions. In addition jailbreaking provisions, it renewed an exemption allowing e-book copy controls to be circumvented to enable read-aloud functions or to render the text into a specialized format. That's a clause advocates for the blind fought for.

The agency also granted an exemption allowing users to break DVD copyright controls to extract snippets of copyrighted movies for the purpose of incorporating them into new works, so long as the new creation is noncommercial. Known as "vidding," such remixing is a popular hobby among fan artists, and their creations are widely available for viewing on YouTube.

The ruling doesn't remove all of the legal murk around vidding. Creators still need to ensure that their clips meets "fair use" guidelines, and the Copyright Office specified that its exemption applies only to motion-picture snippets extracted "for the purpose of criticism or comment."

But advocates say the decision is a big step forward. Hollywood movie studios had long held that ripping DVDs for any purpose whatsoever is a violation of the DMCA.

"This ruling is useful because it removes a tool that was able to be deployed over and above copyright law that already has fair-use safety valves," said Rebecca Tushnet, a law professor at Georgetown University who testified in favor of the exception at a Library of Congress rulemaking hearing last year. "Now we're back to where we should have been all along, and we can continue the conversation about what's reasonable fair use."

Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) declined to comment on the implications for YouTube of the new exemption.

Lobbying group Electronic Frontier Foundation, which requested and backed the jailbreaking and remixing exemptions, celebrated its victory on Monday.

"We are thrilled to have helped free jailbreakers, unlockers and vidders from this law's overbroad reach," Jennifer Granick, EFF's civil liberties director, said in a prepared statement. "The Copyright Office recognizes that the primary purpose of the locks on cell phones is to bind customers to their existing networks, rather than to protect copyright."

Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Click to expand...

ClutchCity3 · Jul 26, 2010

Well we brought the device..and therefore we have the rights to do anything to it

kaleidosky · Jul 26, 2010

yep, was just gonna post this when i got sidetracked by roy williams/dez bryant

happy to see it..

geeimsobored · Jul 26, 2010

Given how poorly written and vague the DMCA is, I'm glad they came out and clarified something like this.

Southern Select · Jul 26, 2010

Are liberals going boycott the evil Apple corporation? I think there is an app for that.

YourSecretLover · Jul 26, 2010

in before the Apple fanboys/haters

Mulder · Jul 26, 2010

Southern Select said:

Are liberals going boycott the evil Apple corporation? I think there is an app for that.
Click to expand...

???

I don't get this comment.

BetterThanI · Jul 26, 2010

Southern Select said:

Are liberals going boycott the evil Apple corporation? I think there is an app for that.
Click to expand...

This has nothing to do with liberal/conservative. Please take your rantings back to D&D.

Forums

US Copyright Office Legalizes Jailbreaking for iPhone

BleedRocketsRed Member

ClutchCity3 Member

kaleidosky Member

geeimsobored Member

Southern Select Member

YourSecretLover Member

Mulder Member

BetterThanI Member

Share This Page

About ClutchFans

Rockets Content

Support ClutchFans!