Tmac at 3 and Ron at 2, is this the best?

or vice versa. It depends on the defensive assignment. I'm sure that ron would play some 3 against someone like miami, if beasley and marion are on the floor at the same time.

 

maybe maybe no

 

how about Tmac 1, Ron 2, Battier 3... D & O matchup nightmare?

 

it doesnt really matter at all with Adlemans pass, read and cut system. It just depends on defensive assignments IMO.

 

this is off topic but we still need a backup point guard, unless adelman is handing the reigns to aaron brooks.

 

useless thread..

 

i don't

battier at the point?

 

I like to see this lineups: Tmac Battier Artest Scola Yao OR
Barry, Tmac, Battier, Artest and Yao.

 

There's really no difference in whether tmac is at the 2 or 3 artest will still always guard the better defender

 

I wonder if Ron has the speed to stop D Williams. D will like to abuse Rafer with his strength, let Ron handle him the same way.

 

That will be very interesting and i hope to see that happen

 

funny thread.

why not tell us what's in ur mind?

 

It doesn't matter who plays the two and who plays the three. Ron will guard the better player between the 2 and 3 and the quicker guy from the opposing team will most likely guard Tmac. That will happen whether you put Ron at the 2 or the 3.

 

What position you play is not determined by who you defend. Coaches change matchups all game long, that's irrelevant.

Tracy is our SG.

 

exactly, that's just what I have been thing about. tmac will be a great PG like MJ because Tmac refers to conTemporary MAgiC.

 

I guess this thread couldn't have passed unless you muttered those conTemporary MAgiC words. Again.

 

uh...

anyways, I would like to see Barry play some point, and only play Battier and Artest together in the second half (if needed).

 

MJ = Mike James