If Webber was not a variable in our thinking, how would you look at the draft?

a.k.a vince · Jun 3, 2001

I personally think that Zac Randolp (excuse the mispelled name) would be a no brainer. A McDonald's all american. A guy who has the size and moves around the court very fluently.

Big at 270, but carries his weight well. And some great post up moves. A good nose for rebounds.

Man, that would be my pick. And I'd take either Wallace or Morris with the 23rd pick. And I'd look to draft Ken Johnston with the 18th pick.

That would cover all the 3 big positions. I'd be ecstatic with the selections.

But, only if Webber wasn't in the picture.

------------------

finalsbound · Jun 3, 2001

Uh...no. I've watched Randloph enough this year.

The guy is FOOOOUUUUL PRONED!

I want it to be like this:

13. Richard Jefferson -he'd be taken before 18.-
18. Ken Johnson -big man shotblocker ~with heart~-
23. Terance Morris -easily could greatly improve playing with Stevie.-

------------------
"They couldn't shoot, rebound, or pass, but other than that, they played great!"

-Bill Walton

Joe Joe · Jun 3, 2001

If I knew Webber and Mo were both gone....

I'd probably try to move up three or four spots for Woods. I know he's skinny and may be there at the #13, but he can fit in offensively and help out with Blocking ability.

------------------

Forums

If Webber was not a variable in our thinking, how would you look at the draft?

a.k.a vince Member

finalsbound Member

Joe Joe Go Stros!
Supporting Member

Share This Page

About ClutchFans

Rockets Content

Support ClutchFans!

If Webber was not a variable in our thinking, how would you look at the draft?

a.k.a vince Member

finalsbound Member

Joe Joe Go Stros! Supporting Member

Share This Page

Joe Joe Go Stros!
Supporting Member