1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

  2. ROCKETS GAMEDAY
    The Wizards may be tanking, but the Rockets can't take Washington lightly. Come join Dave, Ben and Chron.com's Michael Shapiro for live postgame after the Rockets-Wizards matchup.

    LIVE! ClutchFans on YouTube

Expectations of Privacy

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Rocket River, Jul 18, 2007.

  1. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    66,670
    Likes Received:
    34,339
    Someone sent this to me. . . I am not sure if it is true but it did make me think.


    http://www.break.com/index/are-you-friggin-kiddin-me.html

    Basically it says the FBI has the ability to activate the microphone on your cellphone even when it is turned off. Allowing them to ease drop on you.

    What are your expectations of Privacy?
    As Technology progresses . . .the concept of Privacy seems to dwindle more
    Between cameras on Cell phones and 'spy' technology being available at
    all these stores and on the internet
    Basically you have little to no Privacy . . .. or maybe little to no Expectation of privacy
    mainly because
    you never know where these things are

    Do you feel the Law has kept up with the changing technology?
    Esp in the realm of Law Enforcement?

    Rocket River
     
  2. wizkid83

    wizkid83 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,348
    Likes Received:
    850
    I might be mistaken, but isn't the "right" to privacy derived from the right to property?
     
  3. RocketRaccoon

    RocketRaccoon Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2001
    Messages:
    3,851
    Likes Received:
    164
    I don't equate my happiness with anything man-made.

    Also, I'm the happiest when I'm without expectations.

    Hence, no expectations!

    RR
     
  4. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,999
    Likes Received:
    3,441
    Sort of but more specific is the 4th amendment and the right to be free from unreasonable searches (hence privacy expectations) Also, the 14th amendment extends that right to everyone, hence a universal expectation of privacy.
     
  5. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,618
    Likes Received:
    3,505
    with modern technology and today's state (from terrorism to marketing/research firms) people should expect less privacy.
     
  6. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    58,433
    Likes Received:
    42,604
    No, people should expect their constitutional rights to be guarded. What an absurd attitude, with all due respect.



    D&D. Here We Are.
     
  7. nyquil82

    nyquil82 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    5,174
    Likes Received:
    3
    oooo...pick me! I know the right answer!!!

    "If you have nothing to hide, why should you be concerned about privacy???"

    Only terrorists are afraid of the FBI listening in on them, right?
     
  8. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,618
    Likes Received:
    3,505

    ok, but its realistic and it isnt going to get any better. I can google earth your house, look up how much your house is worth, find all your past addresses and phone numbers, depending on where you work i can find your pay, depending on where you donate i can look that up,etc etc... all without getting out of this chair. Here we are indeed.
     
  9. No Worries

    No Worries Wensleydale Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    34,093
    Likes Received:
    22,404
    I for one trust King W's competency, especially wrt protecting the Constitutional Rights (along with W's back dated signing letter) of white Christian male American citizens.

    Good times.
     
  10. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,618
    Likes Received:
    3,505
    only took 7 posts to drag the GWs name into it for no real reason...slacking to day arent we ;)
     
  11. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    15,015
    Likes Received:
    9,679
    that is about 6 posts too late.

    this administration is the one which authorized illegal spying and pushed "the patriot act" on american citizens, so to bring up your presidents name seems appropriate.
     
  12. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,618
    Likes Received:
    3,505
    the privacy concerns are not limited to the patriot act alone
     
  13. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    15,015
    Likes Received:
    9,679
    and your point is?

    the fact of the matter is that this is the most invasive administration in our nations history, while at the same time being the most secretive. these criminals have proven themselves time and time again to not be trusted and to be more than willing to straight up lie to the american people.

    bush lied to us all when he said "anytime you talk about wiretaps, a wiretap requires a court order and constitutional guarantees are still in place".
     
  14. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    Privacy, while not explicitly a right, is derived from property rights, and restrictions against unreasonable search/seizure.

    Anybody advocating an expectation of less privacy due to some 9/11-induced hysteria only reveals their own lack of personal integrity and foresight.

    The recent erosions of privacy under the Bush admin are heinous.
     
  15. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,618
    Likes Received:
    3,505

    my point is simply. the privacy topic extends beyond this administration, its a shame you cant look past that and actually talk about the issue, not the administration.

    thread officially dead.
     
  16. Rockets2K

    Rockets2K Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2000
    Messages:
    18,050
    Likes Received:
    1,271
    but the privacy issues irt the Patriot Act et al are the only ones happening RIGHT NOW.

    Once again you use the exact same response....everytime something like this pops up.

    So, what you are saying is that since other politicians have done things we dont like, its NOT ok to blast the CURRENT perpetrators for what they are doing?

    not by a long shot amigo

    not for another two years at least.
     
  17. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,618
    Likes Received:
    3,505
    what does the privacy act have to do with google earth? the pictures taken from the street? marketing companies that gather and share information? Lexus/Nexus were you can look up someone's market value of their home, past addresses, phone numbers etc.

    i was just saying the privacy issues, goes well beyond the patriot act.
     
  18. No Worries

    No Worries Wensleydale Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    34,093
    Likes Received:
    22,404
    Most people do not expect privacy on their public records.
     
  19. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,618
    Likes Received:
    3,505

    fair enough. But it is surprising how much information you can get about someone for the right price.

    If we are talking in terms of law enforcement, i think that there will be (or is) a slow shift towards something more like the british have. Rather than probable cause, i believe they have something like reasonable doubt (i forget the exact term)...basically a slightly less strict guidline for allowing search and surveilence. Personally i feel that sometimes law enforcement is somewhat hindered at times and i am more than willing to help them do their job more effectively, if it indeed will.
     
  20. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    58,433
    Likes Received:
    42,604
    Do it.



    D&D. Big Brother is Looking at YOU.
     

Share This Page