Sports Illustrated Swimsuit cover...How is this a problem?

I'd say a little too risque for the grocery store checkout, but this era is just swimming in p*rn. This cover is a drop in the ocean. I don't think its good for us at all (regardless of how much I might like it anyway).

 

if it doesn't come with the baseball bloopers and the football shaped phone, i do not want!

 

Sports Illustrated may not be around much longer. Going to far is what they have to do...

 

I haven't paid for a sports illustrated since this fiasco:

Spoiler

 

Don't forget Chastain bumping Bagwell. Fack SI, we want REEL PRONZ!!!

 

Bunch of noobs lol. Nothing wrong with it

 

What is this "sports illustrated" magazine you all keep referring to?

 

Thank you for spoilering that.

Definitely NSFW.

 

I cancelled my subscription that week and have never read one since. Not even in a dentist office. si sucks.

 

I think it would have been a better cover if they had her pull it down further and then use more digital smoothing to remove everything. Then no one could have a problem because they could claim it isn't a girl.

 

It would become a Barbie doll

 

Nothing out of the ordinary.

Only a matter of years until America embraces full frontal nudity, for females that is.

 

I didn't even realize how low she was tugging on the bottom piece until I saw the outrage and went back for a second look. I still don't see what the problem is.

 

Very glad I wasn't alive in 1975 then.

That is a very nice cover.

 

Thanks. I lost my appetite and completely forgot why I came to this thread.

 

What about Dazzling Dunks and Basketball Bloopers, the pre-Christmas and -Spring Break staple of junior high P.E. coaches everywhere.

 

Cuz they were all strung out on coke and pissed off at Nixon?