1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

# 1 aside, why should it be so unrealistic to get Lewis? (warning: long post!)

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by AroundTheWorld, May 26, 2002.

  1. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,295
    I have brought this up before without much reaction. Following Will's logic in his post (which I thought was great) it is really all about the composition of the players on the team - they need to make sense as a combo. I definitely do not see Lewis as worthy of giving away a # 1 pick - any such talk is ridiculous and should be dismissed immediately. However, I do think it should be possible to work out a trade without involving the # 1 or Francis, Mobley and Griffin.

    The following is based on my following assumptions (which I believe are true) and facts:

    1) Lewis wants to play in Houston or at least seriously considers it. He is not just using Houston to get a higher offer from the Sonics. (assumption).

    2) Lewis' style fits the Rockets (assumption). He is a deadly three-point shooter, good rebounder and overall a high-percentage shooter (fact).

    3) The Rockets want Lewis and believe he would fit in well with the rest of the team (assumption - this is the one I doubt the most because it is so odd that CD and Rudy did not pick Rashard back then - I wonder if whatever motivated them to do so would no longer hold them back now. I hope so.).

    4) The Sonics don't have a first-round pick this year (fact). There are some potential impact players in this draft for them which could be available at # 15: Hilario, Tskithisfadsfsdgabsabdbbsvavili, Stoudemire, Chris Marcus, Frank Williams, etc. They also have Radmanovic who is a decent alternative to Lewis at the 3 and Desmond Mason. (my opinion)

    5) The Sonics were very interested in Mo Taylor before he signed with Houston. (fact)

    6) The Sonics don't really have a decent shot-blocking threat at center - maybe Calvin Booth, but I would say that even Cato might be better than Booth or any other center they have. (just my opinion)

    7) Seattle might be hesitant to just pay Lewis the max and keep him. (assumption).

    I really do not see how a package of # 15, Taylor and perhaps Cato or, if they don't like Cato, Thomas, Norris or whoever they want except Francis, Mobley, Griffin would be that unrealistic if Lewis basically tells the Sonics he wants to play in Houston. Yes, the Sonics would lose a very good player, but what could they do if he told them he wants to go to Houston and Houston wants him? Yes, they could pay him the most money unless a sign-and-trade is done, but Lewis could force their hand. Again - he should think about where he will have a greater future - Payton is old, Baker is mentally weak and Seattle still has lots of rebuilding to do. Houston, especially now with the No.1, is way ahead of Seattle in terms of rebuilding and getting closer to putting together a team with championship potential.

    I think the Rockets should totally focus their efforts on getting this deal done. They could also throw in their second round picks this year and next year.

    PG: Francis (imo top 5 in his position)
    SG: Mobley (imo top 10)
    SF: Lewis (imo top 10)
    PF: Griffin (at least future top 10, imho)

    In my opinion, this team should make the playoffs if healthy - even with just Collier at center. This is a great young core and if you add just one or two cheap tough veterans (Elie or Avery Johnson or Bo Outlaw type - perhaps even Rice could fill that role), you could have something close to a contender with that team already.

    This is why I think the Rockets' management should totally focus on getting that deal done.

    And NOW comes the icing on the cake - if you add Ming to that team with the No. 1 pick - even if he just turns out to be someone like Rik Smits with a bit better shot-blocking and range in his shot - this could put the team over the edge. Ming would be like an added bonus, he would not have to carry the team and he would have time to grow with the rest of the team. He would not have to score much and in fact he probably even shouldn't score all too much. Francis, Mobley and Lewis should be the three go-to guys on offense - Griffin and Ming should focus on defense and gradually improve their offensive games. Don't you think that the combination of Francis' and Mobley's speed with everyone from 1 to 5 being able to stick the three and with Griffin's and Ming's shotblocking and with having a 7'5 giant in the middle would be deadly to any opposing team? Coming to Will's logic on why to draft Ming (because suddenly everyone else on the team would make sense together), I think that the composition of this team would be just perfect.

    Francis, Mobley, Lewis, Griffin, Ming - in my mind, this team has all the potential in the world to go from being good to true greatness. After a lot of thinking, I would even prefer this team to a team with just Francis and Garnett and scrubs for which we would have to blow up our core. If things go bad and Ming sucks, it would still be a very good team. If Ming turns out to be better than Shawn Bradley, this team could potentially dominate for 10 years.

    My question to aelliott or NIKEStrad or some other cap guru is the following:

    In what order would things (giving Francis the extension, drafting Ming, doing a sign-and-trade deal with the Sonics) have to be done for this to work if it were to work?

    Thanks for the patience in reading this long post and I would be happy to see some constructive replies.
     
    #1 AroundTheWorld, May 26, 2002
    Last edited: May 26, 2002
  2. NYKRule

    NYKRule Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    1
    The sign and trade would have to happen when/after the signings actually begin (July 15, 16, or 17, I forgot which one).
     
  3. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    42,169
    Likes Received:
    17,153
    The problem here is that Sonics can call the bluff. Lewis says "I want Houston". Sonics say "Go to Houston".

    Then, it just depends on how much the money means to him, and the Sonics probably have an idea on this. Lewis can get his money one of two ways:

    (1) Signing with the Sonics
    (2) Sign & Trade

    If the Sonics kill #2, he only has one option if he wants the money.
     
  4. heypartner

    heypartner Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    64,090
    Likes Received:
    60,125
    I agree that signing Ming frees us to make a trade for a SF whereby we give up more value. Like, I'm OK now OK with trading KT, although I'm adamant about him being more valuable in trades next summer.

    to answer your questions:

    Sign-n-trades that involve a significant jump in salary are very hard to pull off without the receiving team having cap spade or a trade exception, which we don't. It is makes it very difficult to acquire Lewis if he indeed wants the max or near max.

    It is the whole problem with Base-Year Compensation players, which is difficult to describe. aelliott has a pretty concise explanation that people seem to appreciate without being too technical. My explanation is to just explain why the BYC rule exists. It exists to prevent a loophole in the 15% Trade Rule where one team artificially bloats the salary of one player merely to match another players bloated salary.
     
  5. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,295
    Umm, okay, thanks. If we traded Mo Taylor, Cato, the 15, the 38 and our second-round pick next year for Lewis: Who would be the base-year compensation player involved? And wouldn't Taylor and Cato together make the max or something close to it or perhaps even more?
     
  6. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,295
    Okay, that would be bad. Then I don't really know how a draft-day trade with the Sonics involving the picks could be combined with a sign-and-trade of Lewis.


    True. The only way it could work is if Lewis really made it clear that he does NOT want to stay with the Sonics under any circumstances.
     
  7. GATER

    GATER Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    SJC -

    Here are the "facts" as I see them.

    1) Rashard Lewis is a Player Option FA and can not be part of a draft day trade. Indications are Lewis will not excercise the option since it is only for $4.9m.

    2) Current contracts expire on July 1st which post dates the draft.

    3) Players signings can not occur until after around July 18th.

    4) The Rockets are over the cap and can not offer Rashard anything more than the MCE (~$5M).

    From here, let's "assume" the Rockets are interested. Now it gets tricky.

    IMO, the ball is basically in Rashard's court. How badly does he want to play for Houston and how much money does he want? Since the Rockets are limited to the MCE, Rashard must come forth and say to the Sonics management that he wants to be a Rocket and will take the Rockets MCE if necessary.

    Seattle then has the choice to:

    1) S&T Lewis to Houston

    2) Call his bluff and let him walk.


    The answer to your question of Rashard as a Rocket is embedded in how much $ Lewis wants. The less money, the easier it is for Houston to obtain him. He can come for as little as the MCE or as much as the Max which will necessitate the Sonics taking on unwanted contracts (they wanted Mo before he was injured, have no use for Rice and Cato isn't verifiably better than Booth, Jerome James or Drobnjak).

    Series of big IF's:

    If Rashard truly wants to be a Rocket

    and

    If the Rockets draft a player at #15 the Sonics like

    and

    if Lewis will take a 3 year deal starting at $8m

    then

    #15 + KT + Cato = Rashard in PJ's.
     
  8. heypartner

    heypartner Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    64,090
    Likes Received:
    60,125
    Sir,

    We can pull a SnT if we get a 3rd team involved who has cap room or a trade exception. I think there is still a chance that Lewis just signs with us with our MCE in order to help create a Houston dynasty.
     
  9. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,295
    Thanks, GATER. That's a lot of IF's, I admit.

    But that deal starting at $ 8 m sounds great to me...could it be a 7-year deal starting at 8 and then increasing by quite a bit instead? Or, if we included Moochie or so in the sign-and-trade, could it be an "almost max" deal?
     
  10. aelliott

    aelliott Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    6,013
    Likes Received:
    5,058
    As explained above, as of now, we can only offer Lewis the MCE. So, if he want's to threaten to walk away from the Sonics and sign with us outright, then he's got to be willing to play for the MCE.

    Even if Seattle believed him, I don't think that it would be in their best interest to to a SnT if it meant that all they were getting back is #15 and some bad contracts (equivilent to at least 85% of Lewis's new deal). They'd be better off calling his bluff and worst case, letting him walk.

    Regarding the question about who the BYC player would be, the answer is Lewis. He made around $4.5M last year. If he signs for more than 115% of that amount (even in a sign and trade), then he immediately becomes a BYC player. So, if the first year of Lewis' new deal exceeds ~$5.2M, then he's a BYC player.

    So, if playing in Houston is worth taking less money to Lewis, then he can do that. Otherwise, you'd have to hope that Seattle is enamored with Cato, Taylor or Rice. To pull off a SnT, they'd have to get a 3rd team, with cap room involved to take some of the 50% BYC amount that Seattle isn't allowed to take back. This is the point that HP was making earlier.
     
    #10 aelliott, May 26, 2002
    Last edited: May 26, 2002
  11. NYKRule

    NYKRule Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    1
    They might listen if its KT+Bad Contract+15 for Lewis.
     
  12. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,295
    Thanks aelliott.
     
  13. aelliott

    aelliott Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    6,013
    Likes Received:
    5,058
    <i>They might listen if its KT+Bad Contract+15 for Lewis.</i>

    See the previous posts. If Lewis is getting more than a 15% raise, then he's a Base Year Compensation player. That means that for the purpose of matching salary in a trade, he would count full amount to Houston, but Seattle could only take back 50%. The only way this can work is if you get a 3rd team with cap space or a traded player exception involved in the deal.
     
  14. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,295
    If Seattle could only take back 50 % - would that not mean # 15, the second-round pick this year and next year (all irrelevant to the cap) and Kenny T + Mo Taylor could work for Rashard Lewis + Shammond Williams if Rashard gets something like a $ 13 mio. contract? Then Seattle could take back 6.5 mio. + the ~ 2 mio. Shammond Williams makes.

    I believe that Mo's and Kenny T's contract would match that.

    I do realize that Seattle still has Vin Baker as well, so they would probably not want to do this. Just trying to understand if we could do it without a third team being involved.
     
  15. GATER

    GATER Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    SJC -

    aelliott has already explained why the Sonics would likely call Rashard's bluff than take on bad contracts. He's right, but...

    My original idea for a 3 yr contract was to allow Lewis to get full Bird Rights with the Rockets who could then up his salary after 3 seasons. The understanding being that he foregoes the Max to make himself more attractive as an S&T (my logic being that Cato is the cheapest and "lesser of 3 evils").


    Just dreamin', but this is a formidable group:

    5) Ming / (Cato / Willis / Collier)
    4) EG / KT / MoT
    3) Lewis / TMo / Rice
    2) Cat / OT
    1) Steve / Mooch
     
  16. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,295
    Okay, something really crazy:

    Rice, Taylor, Thomas, # 15 (= $ 17.9 mio)

    for

    Vin Baker ($ 12.375 mio) + Rashard Lewis (1/2 of ~ 12 mio. = 6 mio.) (= 18.375 mio.)

    The huge downside would be that we would have to eat Baker's horrible contract which lasts until 2005/2006 and peaks out at $ 15.75 mio. per year.

    The upside for us would be that we could have a re-signed Lewis for 7 years - we would have our starting 5 locked up for many years. Actually, Baker is definitely not worth the money he makes but he is also not completely horrible - good size to lean on Shaq, decent shot-blocker - he cannot carry a team, but as the No. 5 or No. 6 behind Francis, Mobley, Lewis, Griffin, Ming, he could be pretty good ;). Plus, when he finally comes off the cap, we could give that money to Mobley and/or Griffin.

    Why would Seattle do it? It would give them a chance to rebuild. I am almost sure that Seattle would consider this one - remember that Payton said all these great things about Kenny Thomas and remember that they do not have a first-round pick this year. Rice comes off the cap after 2003/2004, sooner than Baker. They like Mo Taylor and would have him locked up long-term.

    Our team:

    PG: Francis (6'3), Moochie
    SG: Mobley (6'4), Torres
    SF: Lewis (6'10), Morris
    PF: Griffin (6'10), Baker (6'11)
    C: Ming (7'5), Cato (6'11) (edit: added after GATER's post), Collier (7'0)

    That team has championship written all over it, imho :).
     
    #16 AroundTheWorld, May 26, 2002
    Last edited: May 26, 2002
  17. NYKRule

    NYKRule Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    1
    One problem, the Rockets take in 24 million, get rid of 17. This will be really complicated, if it happens at all.
     
  18. X-PAC

    X-PAC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 1999
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    0
    Much props to Sir Jackie Chiles on a great post. Seeing it from both sides makes it easier to understand the reasoning behind the move. I like the proposed moves alot.
     
  19. GATER

    GATER Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    SJC -

    Did you realize that you left Cato off the Rockets roster after the Baker/Lewis S&T? How could you misplace a 7 footer? :D

    If Seattle proposed this, I would give it some consideration. You would basically have 5 players who could log minutes at the C position (Ming, Cato, Collier, EG, & Baker).

    What is intruiging is that Baker is big enough to defend opposing Centers allowing Ming and EG to get alot of weakside blocks.

    Realistically, I think the Sonics would pass as they may feel they could get more out of Baker than they could MoT and Rice.
     
  20. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,295
    Damn, how could I forget to put Cato in :). Thanks!

    Yes, I think the trade would give us a lot of size and flexibility. To make it more attractive for the Sonics, I personally would even give up our first round pick in 2004 because I have a lot of confidence in this team having a great record in 2003/2004.
     

Share This Page