1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Any word on Bagwell?

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by DaDakota, Jul 15, 2005.

  1. msn

    msn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    11,726
    Likes Received:
    2,093
    :p

    For the fun of it, where do you rank Bagwell all-time with both leagues? Obviously Gehrig is ahead of him. Who else?
     
  2. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    85,785
    Likes Received:
    84,196
    Well, here's the list of HOF first basemen:

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/HOF_register_position.shtml

    Sticking to the "modern era" guys (post 1920's), and excluding guys like Brett, Carew, Yaz, etc... who played most of their careers at other positions, here's my list:

    Lou Gehrig
    Jimmie Foxx
    Harmon Killebrew
    Frank Robinson
    Rafael Palmeiro
    Hank Greenberg
    Jeff Bagwell
    Johnny Mize
    Willie McCovey
    Willie Stargell
    Mark McGwire
    Bill Terry
    Tony Perez
    Eddie Murray
    George Kelly
    Orlando Cepeda

    I'm sure I'm forgetting somebody.
     
  3. DoitDickau

    DoitDickau Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    1,706
    Likes Received:
    66

    okay, but let me preface this by saying that bagwell has been my favorite player since i was a little kids just starting to follow baseball, so obviously i'm more than a little biased in favor of bags.

    of the top of my head i'd say gehrig and foxx are the only one clearly ahead of bagwell. It gets harder to compare against players like mize or greensberg who lost numbers of year due to war service. Bagwell has better career numbers, but greensberg probably had higher peak value, while mize had high peak value as well. if i had to rank them i'd rank bagwell behind greensberg but ahead of mize.

    greenberg (when you factor in lost years due to war)
    cap anson (though hard to really compare to modern ear player)

    I think bagwell ranks slightly ahead of Mcgwire and Thomas, although thomas, really more of a dh than a 1st baseman, could be rank ahead of bags if he can stay healthy for a few more productive. Bagwell's overall talent on the field annd in the basepath, i tihnk is enough to put him ahead of these two.

    i'd also rank him ahead of murray and palmiero due to having a higher peak value.

    Mccovey is a more similar but more interesting case, cause while, bagwell had a high peak value, mccovey was very productive well into his 40's. like mcgwire and thomas though, i'd rank bagwell ahead of him, due to baserun and fielding as mccovey was not a good fielder or baserunning.

    this i just of the top of my head and glancing at baseball-reference, i'd be interested is seeing statistics like jaws, winshares fromthese guys.

    sorry if this is a disjointed answer (and for any typos) trying do this while finishing up work for the week
     
  4. Puedlfor

    Puedlfor Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2000
    Messages:
    5,973
    Likes Received:
    21
    I'm not sure Frank Robinson and Killebrew count as first basemen since they spent most of their careers playing elsewhere.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now