We may have to agree to disagree on this, but to me its no different to say "I really don't believe in conspiracy theories, but here's a conspiracy theory that deserves consideration isn't much different than "I heard Trump donated to NAMBLA..." Republicans have floated out things regarding Clinton since Vince Foster... forgive me if I roll my eyes...
I hate that. If Clinton is dirty, get it out there now, so we can get another candidate. Handing the election to Trump by dumping docs in October is a nightmare scenario.
I don't think anything could come out that would change the minds of Hillary voters since they are going into it thinking she's dirty and we know that she has enough political power to avoid any prosecution even if what comes out is illegal.
Fair enough. Though the difference is, as I said, the rumors of NAMBLA donations don't come from a specific person. His mother and his girlfriend both made similar comments about him speaking to the FBI (not sure who alluded to it being abt Clinton), and now Assange basically saying this guy was the source. There's a significant amount more detail to those accusations than there is on Trump's donations to a pedophile organization. And by those "accusations" I don't mean accusations against Clinton. The man's mother didn't claim her kid was killed because of Clinton. I'm speaking of the accusation that SOMETHING is strange here. The NAMBLA stuff is based simply on the fact that he hasn't/won't release his tax releases, which wouldn't show NAMBLA donations anyways since it's not a tax-deductible charity...unless I've missed something about this claim. I JUST learned of this NAMBLA organization today...and I am hesitant to do any more research on my work computer, lol. So if I'm missing something about these NAMBLA claims, please enlighten me and save me the strange looks from IT
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Hillary Clinton strategist Bob Beckel called for WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange to be assassinated. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DNCLeak?src=hash">#DNCLeak</a> <a href="https://t.co/9L2ixl24Er">pic.twitter.com/9L2ixl24Er</a></p>— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) <a href="https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/763380671796678656">August 10, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> No hypocrisy here...Couldnt have been more explicit...
There is more evidence the murdered DNC guy leaked the documents than Russia did and so If it's ok to discuss whether Russia leaked the DNC emails and that TRUMP is colluding with Russia then it's ok to discuss whether the murdered DNC rep leaked the DNC emails and that HILLARY had him murdered
"Hillary Clinton strategist"? Don't you mean Fox News employee? And before you go... "Beckel doesn't work for Fox News anymore... I know. But I love how republican/conservatives/trump supporters believe trotting the old drunk blowhard's comments somehow makes what Trump said acceptable.
Not voting for Trump and not sure what that has to do with the DNC saying that Hillary was hiding her Wall Street relationships via her supporters being ignorant...
It has nothing to do with it (of course). Its just a hyper partisan deflection from a serious issue not being addressed by Clinton supporters like the one you're responding to. In other words, underoverup is proving your point about ignorant supporters.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">America's journalistic class showing class on assassination. Grunwald, an Obama hagiographer, is now at Politico. <a href="https://t.co/M3kplF9NuF">pic.twitter.com/M3kplF9NuF</a></p>— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) <a href="https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/763402372680908800">August 10, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I'm not sure where you're getting that. It actually isn't true, since we have law enforcement already saying that they were hacked by groups tied to the Russian intelligence agencies.
Hillary blaming it on a black man. Shameful. Where are Rocket River, Sweet Lou, CometsWin and others when Powell needs them. http://www.businessinsider.com/colin-powell-on-clintons-email-scandal-her-people-have-been-trying-to-pin-it-on-me-2016-8 Hillary left out that when Powell was in charge there was no unclassified system to use like there was when she held the office.
What the HELL does race have to do with this... Man you people freaking kill me.... This is all about politics and 2 parties Dem and Rep... Not about race. Personally Clinton is handling this whole thing wrong.. Just spit everything out and then leave the whole subject alone.. T_Man
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">FBI, DOJ launch Probe into Firm of Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta Over Russian Links <a href="https://t.co/cBZrjRIrQh">https://t.co/cBZrjRIrQh</a> <a href="https://t.co/fj8i7mAG6l">https://t.co/fj8i7mAG6l</a></p>— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) <a href="https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/767445608496005120">August 21, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
It doesn't. That was a dig at those who toss the race card 24-7-365. Clinton spit out a bunch of lies and deleted evidence (14,900 e-mails), so you're correct again spit out the truth and let the card fall where they may.
you were literally just shown emails in which the media is giving the Hillary campaign permission to edit stories before they go out. The media concentrated their efforts to destroy Bernie which is shown. But this is your comment?
