Wait, I thought he didn’t do anything he said he would do. So confusing. and your comment sounded racist, like the guy you were agreeing with.
Dude really because i agreed that black American should be out protesting right now come on man do better. And how is Reeko a historically race commentor.
You do realize that most black American didn't vote for 47 so why go out and protest something that black Americans warned the other voter that would happen it's a waste of time .
Oh I see. Just let non-black folks, who warned of the same ****, keep protesting though? That sounds fair. Not racist at all. Fight for your team and stop with the skin color bullshit.
It's honestly funny cuz that account isn't affiliated with the IRGC and that photo is photoshoped but of course the dumbass boomers will believe anything they see on the internet
He said nothing about “non blacks”, and he also said nothing about what what black people “should” do.
He agreed with the person who did. and he agreed with that person about what black people should not do.
'No Kings' protests recap: More than 8 million turned out across all 50 states, organizers say More than 8 million people turned out at over 3,300 “No Kings” protests across all 50 states on Saturday, organizers said, calling it the largest single-day demonstration in U.S. history. The first two rounds, in June and October 2025, drew an estimated 5 million and 7 million, respectively. Independent verification of the figures was not immediately available.
I think it was “shouldn’t have to” rather than “shouldn’t” (i.e. “not their fight”). But I guess your point here is that it’s tacitly creating a division in responsibility based on race, which you consider racist. Do I have that right? I’m not sure I agree it’s racist under the assumptions that (1) social responsibility goes up with one’s social capital and (2) black people on average in these cities where protests are happening have less social capital than non-black people. But perhaps you reject those assumptions as well.
